Establishing Recency and Updating Needs for Cochrane Reviews on Selected Complementary Medicine Interventions: Study Protocol
| dc.contributor.author | Pratt, Misty | |
| dc.contributor.author | Hutton, Brian | |
| dc.contributor.author | Wieland, Susan | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ahmadzai, Nadera | |
| dc.contributor.author | Skidmore, Becky | |
| dc.contributor.author | Moher, David | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-04-10T13:52:12Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2017-04-10T13:52:12Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2017-04-01 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Previous research evaluating a cohort of published systematic reviews demonstrated that 7% of reviews were out of date by the time of publication while as many as 23% went out of date within two years of being completed. The utility of systematic review-based evidence depends on their remaining up-to-date. As such, the Cochrane Complementary Medicine Field and the Knowledge Synthesis group at the Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (OHRI) have determined a set of existing reviews of interest for which signal detection work using the Ottawa Method’s qualitative/quantitative signal detection approach and some additional considerations will be performed. | en |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10393/35969 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.20381/ruor-20250 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | en |
| dc.subject | signal detection | en |
| dc.subject | systematic review | en |
| dc.title | Establishing Recency and Updating Needs for Cochrane Reviews on Selected Complementary Medicine Interventions: Study Protocol | en |
| dc.type | Other | en |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- Protocol for Signal Detection for currency of CAM reviews_FINAL_Apr2017.pdf
- Size:
- 493.66 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:
License bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- license.txt
- Size:
- 4.92 KB
- Format:
- Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
- Description:
