Repository logo

Environmental scan of librarian involvement in uOttawa systematic & scoping reviews

dc.contributor.authorFarrell, Peter
dc.contributor.authorCole, Victoria
dc.contributor.authorDaSilva, Emily
dc.contributor.authorLy, Valentina
dc.contributor.authorSterling, Evan
dc.contributor.authorDehler, Nicholas
dc.contributor.authorEl Hofi, Alain
dc.contributor.authorRokolj, Téa
dc.contributor.authorVisintini, Sarah
dc.contributor.authorLabelle, Patrick
dc.contributor.authorSikora, Lindsey
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-30T13:50:45Z
dc.date.available2023-08-30T13:50:45Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Requests for librarian collaboration on knowledge synthesis projects at the University of Ottawa have increased over time. Despite having significant impact on workload, the intellectual contributions of librarians are not always recognized through authorship or acknowledgement. We conducted an environmental scan to establish a baseline for how librarian involvement is reported in all systematic and scoping reviews published by authors affiliated with the University of Ottawa. Specifically, we wanted to better understand the publication volume, workload implications, and extent of reported librarian involvement. Methods: We searched 18 databases across various subject areas. Keyword and publication-type searches were combined with affiliation searches for the University of Ottawa or affiliated research institutes/centres. Published systematic reviews, scoping reviews, meta-analyses, and published protocols for these methodologies were included. All other review methodologies were excluded. Data extraction focused on bibliographic information, librarian involvement, funding, uOttawa affiliation, and the type of review. (Protocol available here: https://osf.io/bqd26/) Results: Search results yielded 20,270 records. After duplicates were removed, 8,805 records were screened by title and abstract. 6,049 records passed to full-text screening (currently underway). Preliminary results show reviews from a greater diversity of disciplines than originally anticipated. Consistency of review nomenclature varies greatly between disciplines and poses a challenge in ensuring consistency during screening. Discussion: This environmental scan maps systematic and scoping review publications across disciplines at the University of Ottawa. Better understanding the proportion of reviews with librarian involvement will help guide policy and procedure development around knowledge synthesis services, and enable us to project resourcing needs in the future.en_US
dc.identifier.citationFarrell, P. (2023, June 4). An environmental scan of librarian involvement in systematic reviews and scoping reviews at the University of Ottawa [Conference presentation]. CHLA 2023, Halifax, NS, Canada.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10393/45354
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.20381/ruor-29560
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectScoping Reviewsen_US
dc.subjectSystematic Reviewsen_US
dc.subjectLibrary collaborationen_US
dc.subjectKnowledge synthesisen_US
dc.titleEnvironmental scan of librarian involvement in uOttawa systematic & scoping reviewsen_US
dc.typeConference Proceedingen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail ImageThumbnail Image
Name:
farrell-2023-environmental-scan-librarian-involvement-uOttawa.pdf
Size:
1.01 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
PDF of conference presentation, originally created as a MS PowerPoint presentation.

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail ImageThumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
4.92 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: