Repository logo

Breast density and risk of interval cancers: The effect of annual versus biennial screening mammography policies in Canada

dc.contributor.authorSeely, Jean Morag
dc.contributor.authorPeddle, Susan Elizabeth
dc.contributor.authorYang, Huiming
dc.contributor.authorChiarelli, Anna M.
dc.contributor.authorMcCallum, Megan
dc.contributor.authorNarasimhan, Gopinath
dc.contributor.authorZakaria, Dianne
dc.contributor.authorEarle, Craig C.
dc.contributor.authorFung, Sharon
dc.contributor.authorBryant, Heather
dc.contributor.authorNicholson, Erika
dc.contributor.authorPolitis, Chris
dc.contributor.authorBerg, Wendie
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-10T21:54:48Z
dc.date.available2021-09-10T21:54:48Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractRegular screening mammography reduces breast cancer mortality. However, in women with dense breasts, the performance of screening mammography is reduced, which is reflected in higher interval cancer rates (ICR). In Canada, population-based screening mammography programs generally screen women biennially; however, some provinces and territories offer annual mammography for women with dense breast tissue routinely and/or on recommendation of the radiologist. This study compared the ICRs in those breast screening programs with a policy of annual vs. those with biennial screening for women with dense breasts. Among 148,575 women with dense breasts screened between 2008 to 2010, there were 288 invasive interval breast cancers; screening programs with policies offering annual screening for women with dense breasts had fewer interval cancers 63/70,814 (ICR 0.89/1000, 95% CI: 0.67-1.11) compared with those with policies of usual biennial screening 225/77,761 (ICR 1.45 /1000 (annualized), 95% CI: 1.19-1.72) i.e. 63% higher (p = 0.0016). In screening programs where radiologists' screening recommendations were able to be analyzed, a total of 76,103 women were screened, with 87 interval cancers; the ICR was lower for recommended annual (65/69,650, ICR 0.93/1000, 95% CI: 0.71, 1.16) versus recommended biennial screening (22/6,453, ICR 1.70/1000 (annualized), 95%CI: 0.70, 2.71)(p = 0.0605). Screening program policies of annual as compared with biennial screening in women with dense breasts had the greatest impact on reducing interval cancer rates. We review our results in the context of current dense breast notification in Canada.en_US
dc.identifier.citationSeely JM, Peddle SE, Yang H, Chiarelli AM, McCallum M, Narasimhan G, Zakaria D, Earle CC, Fung S, Bryant H, Nicholson E, Politis C, Berg W. Breast Density and Risk of Interval Cancers: The Effect of Annual Versus Biennial Screening Mammography Policies in Canada. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2021 Jul 19:8465371211027958. doi: 10.1177/08465371211027958. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 34279132.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/08465371211027958en_US
dc.identifier.issn0846-5371 (Linking) 1488-2361 (Electronic)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34279132en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/08465371211027958en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10393/42654
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.20381/ruor-26874
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectBreast densityen_US
dc.subjectScreening mammographyen_US
dc.subjectInterval canceren_US
dc.subjectSupplemental screeningen_US
dc.subjectBreast MRIen_US
dc.titleBreast density and risk of interval cancers: The effect of annual versus biennial screening mammography policies in Canadaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail ImageThumbnail Image
Name:
Seely-2021-Breast-density-and-risk-of-interval (1).pdf
Size:
454.71 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Main file

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail ImageThumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
4.92 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: