Repository logo

Happy Meat as a Passive Revolution: A Gramscian Analysis of Ethical Meat

dc.contributor.authorGagnon, Pierre-André
dc.contributor.supervisorPaterson, Matthew
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-08T21:17:28Z
dc.date.available2019-02-08T21:17:28Z
dc.date.issued2019-02-08en_US
dc.description.abstractThis thesis starts from the proposition that the ethical meat discourse that is, the discourse recognizing that factory farming is unacceptable while maintaining that it is possible to produce meat in an acceptable way — has not been thoroughly analyzed. Indeed, both the partisans of this idea and the animal rights literature provide oversimplified analyses of this relatively new phenomenon. Considering its explosion in popularity since Michael Pollan published the essay “An Animal's Place” in The New York Times Magazine in 2002, this lack of research is particularly problematic for the animal rights movement as this new discourse directly counters its objectives. As such, this thesis uses Gramsci’s concept of passive revolution to develop a richer analysis of the apparent marginalizing effect that this discourse has on the animal rights movement. More precisely, the thesis addresses the question: “If the emergence of the ethical meat discourse is understood as part of a passive revolution, what can the specific process of passive revolution tell us about the impacts of the ethical meat discourse on the animal rights movement?” It argues that the passive revolution operates on two levels: (1) it depoliticizes the issue of meat consumption by presenting it as irrelevant and reducing it to technical details and (2) it absorbs the moderate elements of the animal rights movement by proposing an attractive alternative. Both of these processes lead to the marginalization of the few animal advocacy organizations still criticizing ethical meat. The analysis is divided in three parts. The first and second analyze respectively the content of the discourse and internal dynamics of the coalition formed around it using Maarten Hajer’s concept of discourse-coalition. Building on this comprehensive understanding of the ethical meat discourse, the actual process of passive revolution is analyzed by looking at the way the meat industry, environmental organizations and animal advocacy organizations engage with it.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10393/38809
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.20381/ruor-23061
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversité d'Ottawa / University of Ottawaen_US
dc.subjectEthical meaten_US
dc.subjectAnimal rightsen_US
dc.subjectGramscien_US
dc.subjectPassive revolutionen_US
dc.subjectHajeren_US
dc.subjectHumane meaten_US
dc.subjectAntonio Gramscien_US
dc.subjectMaarten Hajeren_US
dc.subjectDiscourse coalitionen_US
dc.subjectAnimal-Industrial Complexen_US
dc.subjectPolitical analysisen_US
dc.subjectVeganen_US
dc.subjectVeganismen_US
dc.subjectAnimal liberationen_US
dc.subjectCritical animal studiesen_US
dc.subjectDiscourse analysisen_US
dc.subjectIdeologyen_US
dc.subjectOrganic crisisen_US
dc.titleHappy Meat as a Passive Revolution: A Gramscian Analysis of Ethical Meaten_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
thesis.degree.disciplineSciences sociales / Social Sciencesen_US
thesis.degree.levelDoctoralen_US
thesis.degree.namePhDen_US
uottawa.departmentÉtudes politiques / Political Studiesen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail ImageThumbnail Image
Name:
Gagnon_Pierre-Andre_2019_thesis.pdf
Size:
1.47 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail ImageThumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
6.65 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: