Repository logo

Ambrosiaster’s Interpretations of Roman 1:26-27

dc.contributor.authorde Bruyn, Theodore
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-18T15:55:19Z
dc.date.available2022-10-18T15:55:19Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.description.abstractScholarly discussions of patristic interpretations of Romans 1:26-27 have overlooked the fact that Ambrosiaster revised his reading of the passage. In the first version of his commentary on Romans, Ambrosiaster understands verse 26 to refer to “unnatural” sexual relations between women and men, whereas in the second and third versions he understands the verse to refer to “unnatural” sexual relations between women. The paper examines the differences between the three versions, explains Ambrosiaster’s remarks, and situates his interpretation within the moral outlook and exegetical tradition of Latin Christian writers.en_US
dc.identifier.citationTheodore de Bruyn, “Ambrosiaster’s Interpretations of Roman 1:26-27,” Vigiliae Christianae 65 (2011): 463–483.en_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1163/157007211X561635en_US
dc.identifier.issn0042-6032en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10393/44177
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.20381/ruor-28390
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectAmbrosiasteren_US
dc.subjectfemale homoeroticismen_US
dc.subjecthomosexualityen_US
dc.subjectRomans 1:26-27en_US
dc.titleAmbrosiaster’s Interpretations of Roman 1:26-27en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail ImageThumbnail Image
Name:
de Bruyn, Ambrosiaster on Romans 1.26-27 - post peer-review version.pdf
Size:
297.14 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail ImageThumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
4.92 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: