Energy availability discriminates clinical menstrual status in exercising women
| dc.contributor.author | Reed, Jennifer L | |
| dc.contributor.author | De Souza, Mary J | |
| dc.contributor.author | Mallinson, Rebecca J | |
| dc.contributor.author | Scheid, Jennifer L | |
| dc.contributor.author | Williams, Nancy I | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2015-12-18T10:55:44Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2015-12-18T10:55:44Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2015-02-19 | |
| dc.date.updated | 2015-12-18T10:55:44Z | |
| dc.description.abstract | Abstract Background Conditions of low energy availability (EA) (<30 kcal/kgLBM) have been associated with suppressed metabolic hormones and reductions in LH pulsatility in previously sedentary women during short-term manipulations of energy intake (EI) and exercise energy expenditure (EEE) in a controlled laboratory setting. The purpose of this study was to examine if EA, defined as EA = (EI-EEE)/kgLBM, is associated with disruptions in ovarian function in exercising women. Methods Menstrual status was confirmed with daily measures of urinary reproductive metabolites across 1–3 menstrual cycles or 28-day monitoring periods. EA was calculated for exercise days using EI from 3-day diet logs, EEE from heart-rate monitors and/or exercise logs for a 7-day period, and body composition from DXA. Resting energy expenditure (REE) was measured by indirect calorimetry. Total triiodothyronine (TT3) was measured from a fasting blood sample. Results 91 exercising women (23.1 ± 0.5 years) were categorized clinically as either exercising amenorrheic (ExAmen, n = 30), exercising oligomenorrheic (ExOligo, n = 20) or exercising eumenorrheic (ExEumen, n = 41). The eumenorrheic group was further divided into more specific subclinical groups as either exercising ovulatory (ExOv, n = 20), exercising inconsistent (ExIncon, n = 13), or exercising anovulatory (ExAnov, n = 8). An EA threshold of 30 kcal/kgLBM did not distinguish subclinical menstrual status (χ 2 = 0.557, p = 0.46) nor did EA differ across subclinical disturbance groups (p > 0.05). EA was lower in the ExAmen vs. ExEumen (30.9 ± 2.4 vs. 36.9 ± 1.7 kcal/kgLBM, p = 0.04). The ratio of REE/predicted REE was lower in the ExAmen vs. ExEumen (0.85 ± 0.02 vs. 0.92 ± 0.01, p = 0.001) as was TT3 (79.6 ± 4.1 vs. 95.3 ± 2.9 ng/mL, p = 0.002). Conclusions EA did not differ among subclinical forms of menstrual disturbances in a large sample of exercising women, but EA did discriminate clinical menstrual status, i.e., amenorrhea from eumenorrhea. | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition. 2015 Feb 19;12(1):11 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12970-015-0072-0 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10393/33747 | |
| dc.language.rfc3066 | en | |
| dc.rights.holder | Reed et al.; licensee BioMed Central. | |
| dc.title | Energy availability discriminates clinical menstrual status in exercising women | |
| dc.type | Journal Article |
