Review and publication of protocol submissions to Trials – what have we learned in 10 years?

dc.contributor.author	Li, Tianjing
dc.contributor.author	Boutron, Isabelle
dc.contributor.author	Salman, Rustam A
dc.contributor.author	Cobo, Erik
dc.contributor.author	Flemyng, Ella
dc.contributor.author	Grimshaw, Jeremy M
dc.contributor.author	Altman, Douglas G
dc.date.accessioned	2017-01-30T04:15:10Z
dc.date.available	2017-01-30T04:15:10Z
dc.date.issued	2016-12-16
dc.date.updated	2017-01-30T04:15:10Z
dc.description.abstract	Abstract Trials has 10 years of experience in providing open access publication of protocols for randomised controlled trials. In this editorial, the senior editors and editors-in-chief of Trials discuss editorial issues regarding managing trial protocol submissions, including the content and format of the protocol, timing of submission, approaches to tracking protocol amendments, and the purpose of peer reviewing a protocol submission. With the clarification and guidance provided, we hope we can make the process of publishing trial protocols more efficient and useful to trial investigators and readers.
dc.identifier.citation	Trials. 2016 Dec 16;18(1):34
dc.identifier.uri	http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1743-0
dc.identifier.uri	https://doi.org/10.20381/ruor-2638
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10393/35769
dc.language.rfc3066	en
dc.rights.holder	The Author(s).
dc.title	Review and publication of protocol submissions to Trials – what have we learned in 10 years?

Fichiers

Voici les éléments 1 - 1 sur 1

Voici les éléments 1 - 1 sur 1