Comparative validation of the Sleep Disordered Breathing scale of the Sleep Disorders Questionnaire 2nd edition and four other sleep apnea questionnaires against polysomnography
| dc.contributor.author | Douglass, Alan | |
| dc.contributor.author | Groll, Dianne | |
| dc.contributor.author | Biard, Kathleen | |
| dc.contributor.author | Higginson, Caitlin | |
| dc.contributor.author | Savage, Eva | |
| dc.contributor.author | Fonseca, Karina | |
| dc.contributor.author | Lanthier, Malika | |
| dc.contributor.author | Oksit, Defne | |
| dc.contributor.author | Léveillé, Chloé | |
| dc.contributor.author | Côté, Arianne | |
| dc.contributor.author | Leblanc, Noémie | |
| dc.contributor.author | Robillard, Rébecca | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-06-23T04:53:55Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2026-05-25 | |
| dc.date.updated | 2026-06-23T04:53:55Z | |
| dc.description.abstract | Abstract Background The original Sleep Disorders Questionnaire (SDQ, 1994) contained a 12-item sleep apnea subscale (SDQ-SA). SDQ was shortened by factor analysis in 2024 (SDQ-2) and contains a 14-item subscale “Sleep Disordered Breathing” (SDQ2-SDB). This is the first external validation study of the new scale using polysomnography, with a concurrent validation against four commonly used sleep-disordered breathing questionnaires. Methods Members of a large urban police force (n = 733) completed the SDQ2-SDB, Berlin, STOP-Bang, NoSAS, and GOAL questionnaires. A subgroup (n = 101) also volunteered for a laboratory polysomnogram (PSG). SDQ2-SDB scores were analyzed by ANOVA in both samples. For the NPSG subgroup, Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) of the five apnea scales were calculated at a criterion of AHI ≥ 15. A correlation matrix among the five scales was also calculated. Results The NPSG subgroup with higher measured AHI showed significantly higher SDQ2-SDB scores. In the whole sample, SDQ2-SDB scores were significantly higher in males compared with females, in older compared to younger individuals, and in those with higher BMI. Age x Sex, Age x BMI and BMI x Sex effects were also significant. The areas under the ROC curve (AUC) were: SDQ2-SDB = 70%, Berlin = 65%, STOP-Bang = 73%, GOAL = 81%, NoSAS = 85%. The NoSAS AUC was significantly higher (p < 0.03) than those of the SDQ2-SDB, STOP-Bang, and Berlin scales but the latter three scales did not differ significantly from each other. Positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values of the SDQ2-SDB were 46% and 84% respectively, with the other scales ranging between 35 to 52% PPV and 74 to 89% NPV. The SDQ2-SDB correlated with the other four questionnaires with rho ranging from 0.558 to 0.855. Conclusions The SDQ2-SDB scale demonstrates adequate validity in a non-clinical sample. Its performance is similar to questionnaires commonly used for sleep apnea, like the Berlin and STOP-Bang scales. | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Sleep Science and Practice. 2026 May 25;10(1):31 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1186/s41606-026-00194-7 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10393/51777 | |
| dc.language.rfc3066 | en | |
| dc.rights.holder | The Author(s) | |
| dc.title | Comparative validation of the Sleep Disordered Breathing scale of the Sleep Disorders Questionnaire 2nd edition and four other sleep apnea questionnaires against polysomnography | |
| dc.type | Journal Article |
Fichiers
Trousse originale
1 - 1 sur 1
En cours de chargement...
- Nom:
- 41606_2026_Article_194.pdf
- Taille:
- 2.36 MB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
Trousse de licence
1 - 1 sur 1
En cours de chargement...
- Nom:
- license.txt
- Taille:
- 2.51 KB
- Format:
- Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
- Description:
