Sepsis policy, guidelines, and standards in Canada: a jurisdictional scoping review

dc.contributor.authorSheikh, Fatima
dc.contributor.authorChechulina, Victoria
dc.contributor.authorDaneman, Nick
dc.contributor.authorGarber, Gary
dc.contributor.authorHendrick, Kathryn
dc.contributor.authorKissoon, Niranjan
dc.contributor.authorLoubani, Osama
dc.contributor.authorMbuagbaw, Lawrence
dc.contributor.authorRussell, Kristine
dc.contributor.authorWalker, Jennifer D.
dc.contributor.authorFox-Robichaud, Alison
dc.contributor.authorSchwartz, Lisa
dc.contributor.authorBarrett, Kali
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-23T04:53:52Z
dc.date.issued2026-04-30
dc.date.updated2026-06-23T04:53:52Z
dc.description.abstractAbstract Introduction Sepsis, the body’s life-threatening response to infection, is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. In 2017, the World Health Assembly passed a resolution urging member states to recognize sepsis as a public health priority. Our objective was to identify and describe sepsis policies, guidelines, and health professional training standards in Canada. Methods We conducted a scoping review and an environmental scan, including systematic searches of published and grey literature. Policies, guidelines, or training standards related to identifying, managing, or reporting sepsis, published since 2010 and available in English/French, were included. We extracted data on the organization(s) involved in the development, information on the source, including the target patient population, measures of inclusive engagement, and whether the source considered at-risk, equity-denied, and/or Indigenous communities. Results We identified 32 sources of evidence, including sepsis policies or guidelines for 38% (5/13) of provinces and territories, the inclusion of sepsis as a training competency in 16% (11/67) of the Royal College of Canada medical specialties/subspecialties competency standards, and two Canadian Hospital Accreditation Standards. Only 6% (2/32) of the sources considered the role of social determinants of health, and 13% (4/32) engaged individuals with lived sepsis experience or members of the public. Conclusions We identified existing sepsis policies, guidelines, and standards that reveal significant gaps across provinces and territories, particularly the lack of attention to social determinants of health and the exclusion of individuals with lived experience. Coordinated national policy efforts are urgently needed to reduce the burden of sepsis in Canada.
dc.identifier.citationBMC Health Services Research. 2026 Apr 30;26(1):854
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-026-14646-4
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10393/51776
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)
dc.titleSepsis policy, guidelines, and standards in Canada: a jurisdictional scoping review
dc.typeJournal Article

Fichiers

Trousse originale

Voici les éléments 1 - 1 sur 1
En cours de chargement...
Vignette d'image
Nom:
12913_2026_Article_14646.pdf
Taille:
2.42 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Trousse de licence

Voici les éléments 1 - 1 sur 1
En cours de chargement...
Vignette d'image
Nom:
license.txt
Taille:
2.51 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: