Repository logo

Five Criteria to Evaluate Democratic Economic Planning Models

Loading...
Thumbnail ImageThumbnail Image

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Creative Commons

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International

Abstract

This article reviews three models of Democratic Economic Planning, those of Pat Devine and Fikret Adaman, Michael Albert and Robin Hahnel, and Paul Cockshott and Allin Cottrell. Part of a larger research project aiming to merge certain features of these models, this article proposes five criteria to evaluate them. Following a proposal made by David Laibman, it adopts the organization and regulation criteria and add three others to them: limitation, formalization, and scope. Finally, the article offers a brief analysis of the models from those criteria.

Description

This is the Accepted Manuscript of an article published in the Review of Radical Political Economy that you can find here: https://doi.org/10.1177/04866134221093747

Keywords

Democratic economic planning, Pat Devine and Fikret Adaman, Michael Albert and Robin Hahnel, Paul Cockshott and Allin Cottrell, Negotiated coordination, Participatory economics, Postcapitalists models

Citation

Tremblay-Pepin, S. (2022). Five Criteria to Evaluate Democratic Economic Planning Models. Review of Radical Political Economics, 54(3), 265-280.

Related Materials

Alternate Version