Five Criteria to Evaluate Democratic Economic Planning Models

En cours de chargement...
Vignette d'image

Nom de la revue

ISSN de la revue

Titre du volume

Éditeur

Licence Creative Commons

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International

Résumé

This article reviews three models of Democratic Economic Planning, those of Pat Devine and Fikret Adaman, Michael Albert and Robin Hahnel, and Paul Cockshott and Allin Cottrell. Part of a larger research project aiming to merge certain features of these models, this article proposes five criteria to evaluate them. Following a proposal made by David Laibman, it adopts the organization and regulation criteria and add three others to them: limitation, formalization, and scope. Finally, the article offers a brief analysis of the models from those criteria.

Description

This is the Accepted Manuscript of an article published in the Review of Radical Political Economy that you can find here: https://doi.org/10.1177/04866134221093747

Mots-clés

Democratic economic planning, Pat Devine and Fikret Adaman, Michael Albert and Robin Hahnel, Paul Cockshott and Allin Cottrell, Negotiated coordination, Participatory economics, Postcapitalists models

Citation

Tremblay-Pepin, S. (2022). Five Criteria to Evaluate Democratic Economic Planning Models. Review of Radical Political Economics, 54(3), 265-280.

Approbation

Évaluation

Complété par

Référencé par