James of Viterbo on Universals

dc.contributor.authorCôté, Antoine
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-07T20:36:11Z
dc.date.available2018-02-07T20:36:11Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.description.abstractThe chapter starts out with a brief discussion of the similarity alleged to exist by the editors of William Ockham’s Ordinatio between a series of opinions canvassed by Ockham on the nature of universals and a series of opinions listed by James of Viterbo on the nature of concepts. It then proceeds to expound James’s little known theory of concepts and universals, and concludes that, despite interesting parallels between his views and those of the Veneralibilis Inceptor, James’s theory is still very much committed to the realist assumptions that Ockham thought metaphysics needed to dispense with.en
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66634-1en
dc.identifier.isbn978-3-319-66633-4en
dc.identifier.issn2509-4793en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10393/37228
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.20381/ruor-21500
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectJames of Viterbo, William of Ockham, Universalsen
dc.titleJames of Viterbo on Universalsen
dc.typeBook Chapteren

Fichiers

Trousse originale

Voici les éléments 1 - 1 sur 1
En cours de chargement...
Vignette d'image
Nom:
Pages from Pelletier_Roques_language_of_thought.pdf
Taille:
127.68 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

Trousse de licence

Voici les éléments 1 - 1 sur 1
En cours de chargement...
Vignette d'image
Nom:
license.txt
Taille:
4.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: