Electrochemical reactivation of granular activated carbon.
| dc.contributor.advisor | Narbaitz, Roberto M., | |
| dc.contributor.author | Karimi-Jashni, Ayoub. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2009-03-23T13:04:09Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2009-03-23T13:04:09Z | |
| dc.date.created | 2002 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2002 | |
| dc.degree.level | Doctoral | |
| dc.description.abstract | The main objectives of this dissertation were to refine electrochemical GAC reactivation technology, a promising alternative technology, and to investigate its technical feasibility. The specific objectives of the study were: (1) to evaluate alternative reactor designs; (2) to assess the effect of contaminant and GAC types on the regeneration efficiency; (3) to study the electrolyte post-treatment; and (4) to investigate reactivation mechanisms and model them. To achieve these objectives many interrelated topics were investigated using phenol, 2-nitrophenol (2NP) and naturally occurring background organic matter (NOM) as adsorbates and Filtrasorb 400 (F-400), Westvaco Carbon (WV-B), Darco Norit, and Filtrasorb 300 (F-300) as adsorbents. The impact of reactor operation conditions (reactivation time, current density, pH) on the reactivation efficiency showed that the reactivation efficiency (RE%) could be increased to a maximum by increasing the current and/or time. It was concluded that electrochemical reactivation of GAC is contaminant-type dependent. The reactivation efficiencies of F-400 loaded with 2NP and phenol at different reactivation currents and times showed similar patterns. A comparison of the percent reactivation of GACs showed that F-400 and WV-B performed essentially the same for the tested conditions. Total destruction of desorbed contaminants and their by-products were possible. Desorbed phenol and 2NP from loaded GAC react to form a number of reaction by-products that are eventually oxidized to CO2 and H 2O. The main mechanism responsible for electrochemical reactivation is high-pH induced desorption at the cathode. It accounts for approximately 50--60% of the total reactivation of a single layer of GAC. It is recommended that the GAC electrochemical reactivation should be a three step process. First, the GAC is reactivated with a relatively low current to minimize potential alterations of the GAC surface. Second, the GAC is drained and rinsed with a buffered solution. Finally, the electrolyte is treated electrochemically for an extended time at a much higher current (and possibly a different electrode) to reduce the electrolyte's TOC so that it may be reused or discharged. (Abstract shortened by UMI.) | |
| dc.format.extent | 307 p. | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 63-04, Section: B, page: 2005. | |
| dc.identifier.isbn | 9780612672178 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10393/6200 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.20381/ruor-11137 | |
| dc.publisher | University of Ottawa (Canada) | |
| dc.subject.classification | Engineering, Environmental. | |
| dc.title | Electrochemical reactivation of granular activated carbon. | |
| dc.type | Thesis |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
