Repository logo

Effectiveness of inpatient geriatric rehabilitation in those with cognitive impairment: a secondary analysis of meta-analysis data

dc.contributor.authorWong, Eric K. C.
dc.contributor.authorHoang, Peter M.
dc.contributor.authorKouri, Andrew
dc.contributor.authorGill, Sandeep
dc.contributor.authorHuang, Yu Q.
dc.contributor.authorLee, Janice C.
dc.contributor.authorWeiss, Sophie M.
dc.contributor.authorDaniel, Raymond
dc.contributor.authorMcGowan, Jessie
dc.contributor.authorAmog, Krystle
dc.contributor.authorSale, Joanna E. M.
dc.contributor.authorIsaranuwatchai, Wanrudee
dc.contributor.authorNaimark, David M. J.
dc.contributor.authorTricco, Andrea C.
dc.contributor.authorWatt, Jennifer A.
dc.contributor.authorStraus, Sharon E.
dc.date.accessioned2026-05-26T03:50:46Z
dc.date.available2026-05-26T03:50:46Z
dc.date.issued2026-04-15
dc.date.updated2026-05-26T03:50:46Z
dc.description.abstractAbstract Background Geriatric rehabilitation reduces mortality and long-term care home (LTCH) admission. However, cognitive impairment is often perceived to be a barrier for successful rehabilitation. Our objective was to determine the impact of cognitive impairment on rehabilitation outcomes using a systematic review of inpatient geriatric rehabilitation. Methods We conducted a secondary analysis of a recent systematic review and meta-analysis of geriatric rehabilitation in the inpatient settings. We screened 29 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) included in the original systematic review for those that reported rehabilitation outcomes (e.g. mortality, LTCH admission) by cognitive status (high vs. low cognition as defined by score cutoff or dementia diagnosis). Results were analyzed by (i) a meta-analysis of outcomes in those with cognitive impairment and (ii) pooling the within study interaction by cognitive status. Results Of 29 RCTs, 8 RCTs (1134 patients) reported outcomes by cognitive status. For the subgroup of patients with cognitive impairment, the risk ratio (RR) of mortality at the longest follow up was 0.75 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.39 to 1.45, I2 = 61.0%) and the RR of LTCH admission was 0.89 (95% CI 0.62 to 1.28, I2 = 0). There was no interaction between baseline cognitive status and mortality (pooled interaction of difference in logRR − 0.12, 95% CI -0.72 to 0.48) or LTCH admission (pooled interaction 0.17, 95% CI -0.34 to 0.68). Conclusions There is no interaction between baseline cognitive status and the outcomes in this systematic review, suggesting that baseline cognitive impairment does not alter the mortality and institutionalization benefits of geriatric rehabilitation. Review registration PROSPERO: CRD42022345078.
dc.identifier.citationBMC Geriatrics. 2026 Apr 15;26(1):743
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-026-07504-9
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10393/51700
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)
dc.titleEffectiveness of inpatient geriatric rehabilitation in those with cognitive impairment: a secondary analysis of meta-analysis data
dc.typeJournal Article

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail ImageThumbnail Image
Name:
12877_2026_Article_7504.pdf
Size:
924.04 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail ImageThumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.51 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: