Repository logo

Comparison of non-operative versus operative management of resectable colorectal cancer in elderly patients: study protocol for a systematic review

dc.contributor.authorHu, Richard
dc.contributor.authorSelvam, Rajajee
dc.contributor.authorMoloo, Husein
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, Lara
dc.contributor.authorRaiche, Isabelle
dc.contributor.authorMusselman, Reilly
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-26T03:56:11Z
dc.date.available2022-04-26T03:56:11Z
dc.date.issued2022-04-25
dc.date.updated2022-04-26T03:56:11Z
dc.description.abstractAbstract Background In the 2021 Statistics Canada census, 18.5% of the Canadian population were senior (65 years and older), among those 1.7 million (4.5%) were aged 80 years and older. Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer in both men and women, with its highest incidence rate in septu- and octogenarians. As clinicians encounter a growing number of very elderly patients (80 years and older) with resectable colorectal cancer, justifying major surgery in a comorbid population with limited life expectancy is difficult. Therefore, this study aims to systemically review the available literature to compare non-operative management to surgical resection with respect to overall survival and quality of life. Method We designed and registered a study protocol for a systematic review. We will include all patients above the age of 80 with resectable colorectal cancer. We will search MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Database of Controlled Trials from January 2000 onwards. We will include randomized, non-randomized controlled trials and observational studies comparing non-operative versus operative management of resectable colorectal cancer in elderly patients. The primary outcomes will be overall survival and mortality. Secondary outcomes will include quality of life, and health services/ resources utilization (e.g., treatments, change of level of care…). Two reviewers will independently screen all citations, full-text articles, and abstract data. Potential conflicts will be resolved through discussion. The study methodological quality (or bias) will be appraised using the ROB-2 and ROBIN-I tools. If feasible, we will conduct random effects meta-analysis. Additional analyses will be conducted to explore the potential sources of heterogeneity (e.g., study design and methodological quality). Discussion This systematic review will synthesize the existing data on the management of colorectal cancer in the very elderly patients, and identify the gap in the literature for potential future research. More specifically, we aim to streamline non-operative outcome data on resectable colorectal cancers to aid clinicians’ decision-making with respect to survival outcomes and quality of life. The results of this study will be of interest to multiple audiences including patients, their families, caregivers, healthcare professionals, and policy makers. Results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.
dc.identifier.citationSystematic Reviews. 2022 Apr 25;11(1):77
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-01949-w
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.20381/ruor-27730
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10393/43515
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)
dc.titleComparison of non-operative versus operative management of resectable colorectal cancer in elderly patients: study protocol for a systematic review
dc.typeJournal Article

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail ImageThumbnail Image
Name:
13643_2022_Article_1949.pdf
Size:
784.14 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail ImageThumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
0 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: