Repository logo

SDH-deficient renal cell carcinoma – clinical, pathologic and genetic correlates: a case report

dc.contributor.authorKumar, Ravi
dc.contributor.authorBonert, Michael
dc.contributor.authorNaqvi, Asghar
dc.contributor.authorZbuk, Kevin
dc.contributor.authorKapoor, Anil
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-02T04:13:55Z
dc.date.available2018-12-02T04:13:55Z
dc.date.issued2018-11-27
dc.date.updated2018-12-02T04:13:55Z
dc.description.abstractAbstract Background Succinate dehydrogenase (SDH)- deficient renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a newly identified rare subtype of RCC, having only gained acceptance from the World Health Organization in 2016. To the best of our knowledge, there are only 55 reported cases worldwide. Here, we report a new case of SDH-deficient RCC. Case presentation A 49-year-old male patient was incidentally found to have a large right renal mass. He had no personal or family history of paragangliomas (PGL), pheochromocytomas (PC), or gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). The neoplasm was unilateral and unifocal. He underwent an open partial nephrectomy. Detailed pathological analysis was conducted to confirm the diagnosis. Genetic testing revealed a pathogenic mutation in the SDHB gene. He has been followed for 24 months now and has remained well without any evidence of local or distant recurrence. In this report we describe our experience with this diagnosis and review the relevant clinical, pathological, and genetic features. Conclusions Without the identification of SDHB deficiency, this patient’s personal and familial predisposition to PC, PGL, GIST and metachronous RCCs may have gone undetected despite his RCC diagnosis. When faced with an eosinophilic RCC, pathologists should routinely search for vacuoles or flocculent cytoplasmic inclusions. When these are present, or in cases of difficult eosinophilic renal tumors, staining for SDHB is recommended. For tumours without adverse pathologic features (i.e. high nuclear grade, coagulative necrosis, or sarcomatoid differentiation) excision alone may be a reasonable option, with the addition of regular surveillance for PC and PGLs in those found to harbor germline SDH mutations.
dc.identifier.citationBMC Urology. 2018 Nov 27;18(1):109
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-018-0422-8
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.20381/ruor-22774
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10393/38521
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s).
dc.titleSDH-deficient renal cell carcinoma – clinical, pathologic and genetic correlates: a case report
dc.typeJournal Article

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail ImageThumbnail Image
Name:
12894_2018_Article_422.pdf
Size:
1.4 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail ImageThumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
0 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: