Repository logo

Addressing the physician burnout epidemic with resilience curricula in medical education: a systematic review

dc.contributor.authorSeo, Chanhee
dc.contributor.authorCorrado, Mario
dc.contributor.authorFournier, Karine
dc.contributor.authorBailey, Tayler
dc.contributor.authorHaykal, Kay-Anne
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-02T04:29:42Z
dc.date.available2021-02-02T04:29:42Z
dc.date.issued2021-02-01
dc.date.updated2021-02-02T04:29:42Z
dc.description.abstractAbstract Background A variety of stressors throughout medical education have contributed to a burnout epidemic at both the undergraduate medical education (UGME) and postgraduate medical education (PGME) levels. In response, UGME and PGME programs have recently begun to explore resilience-based interventions. As these interventions are in their infancy, little is known about their efficacy in promoting trainee resilience. This systematic review aims to synthesize the available research evidence on the efficacy of resilience curricula in UGME and PGME. Methods We performed a comprehensive search of the literature using MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Educational Resources Information Centre (ERIC), and Education Source from their inception to June 2020. Studies reporting the effect of resilience curricula in UGME and PGME settings were included. A qualitative analysis of the available studies was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I Tool. Results Twenty-one studies met the inclusion criteria. Thirteen were single-arm studies, 6 quasi-experiments, and 2 RCTs. Thirty-eight percent (8/21; n = 598) were implemented in UGME, while 62 % (13/21, n = 778) were in PGME. There was significant heterogeneity in the duration, delivery, and curricular topics and only two studies implemented the same training model. Similarly, there was considerable variation in curricula outcome measures, with the majority reporting modest improvement in resilience, while three studies reported worsening of resilience upon completion of training. Overall assessment of risk of bias was moderate and only few curricula were previously validated by other research groups. Conclusions Findings suggest that resilience curricula may be of benefit to medical trainees. Resilience training is an emerging area of medical education that merits further investigation. Additional research is needed to construct optimal methods to foster resilience in medical education.
dc.identifier.citationBMC Medical Education. 2021 Feb 01;21(1):80
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02495-0
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.20381/ruor-25953
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10393/41731
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)
dc.titleAddressing the physician burnout epidemic with resilience curricula in medical education: a systematic review
dc.typeJournal Article

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail ImageThumbnail Image
Name:
12909_2021_Article_2495.pdf
Size:
963.38 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail ImageThumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
0 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: