Country of Origin Labelling: Econometric Evaluation of the New Rule

dc.contributor.authorMcNeely, Matthew
dc.contributor.supervisorBernard, Jean-Thomas
dc.date.accessioned2014-02-05T16:30:07Z
dc.date.available2014-02-05T16:30:07Z
dc.date.created2013
dc.date.issued2013
dc.description.abstractIn recent years, many agricultural products, namely beef and pork, have been subject to country of origin labelling (COOL)provisions at the retail level in the United States (U.S.)This has caused uproar from many participants in the meat industry due to the law's implications on trade. More recently, the U.S. has adopted revised COOL provisions that became effective in May 2013. Canada and Mexico, the two most affected trading partners of the U.S., have claimed that these new rules are even more restrictive than the original ones and will do further damage to trade. This paper's purpose is to evaluate if this new rule is actually more restrictive on trade as proposed by Canada and Mexico. To accomplish this, I conduct an econometric analysis whereby I test if there was a structural break in imports to the U.S. from Canada after the implementation of the new rule. I find that there is no significant evidence of the new rule having an effect on the industry as of the end of October 2013.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10393/30580
dc.language.isoen
dc.titleCountry of Origin Labelling: Econometric Evaluation of the New Rule

Fichiers

Trousse originale

Voici les éléments 1 - 1 sur 1
En cours de chargement...
Vignette d'image
Nom:
MatthewMcNeely.mrp.pdf
Taille:
589.35 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
McNeely_Matthew_2013_researchpaper

Trousse de licence

Voici les éléments 1 - 1 sur 1
En cours de chargement...
Vignette d'image
Nom:
license.txt
Taille:
4.08 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: