Repository logo

Can the effects of the mobilization of vulnerable elders in Ontario (MOVE ON) implementation be replicated in new settings: an interrupted time series design

dc.contributor.authorMoore, Julia E
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Barbara
dc.contributor.authorKhan, Sobia
dc.contributor.authorHarris, Charmalee
dc.contributor.authorEwusie, Joycelyne E
dc.contributor.authorHamid, Jemila S
dc.contributor.authorStraus, Sharon E
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-07T03:21:00Z
dc.date.available2019-04-07T03:21:00Z
dc.date.issued2019-04-05
dc.date.updated2019-04-07T03:21:01Z
dc.description.abstractAbstract Background Bed rest for older hospitalized patients places them at risk for hospital-acquired morbidity. We previously evaluated an early mobilization intervention and found it to be effective at improving mobilization rates and decreasing length of stay on internal medicine units. The aim of this study was to conduct a replication study evaluating the impact of the evidence-informed mobilization intervention on surgery, psychiatry, medicine, and cardiology inpatient units. Methods A multi-component early mobilization intervention was tailored to the local context at seven hospitals in Ontario, Canada. The primary outcome was patient mobilization measured by conducting visual audits twice a week, three times a day. Secondary outcomes were hospital length of stay and discharge destination, which were obtained from hospital decision support data. The study population was patients aged 65 years and older who were admitted to surgery, psychiatry, medicine, and cardiology inpatient units between March and August 2014. Using an interrupted time series design, the intervention was evaluated over three time periods–pre-intervention, during, and post-intervention. Results A total of 3098 patients [mean age 78.46 years (SD 8.38)] were included in the overall analysis. There was a significant increase in mobility immediately after the intervention period compared to pre-intervention with a slope change of 1.91 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.74–3.08, P-value = 0.0014). A decreasing trend in median length of stay was observed in the majority of the participating sites. Overall, a median length of stay of 26.24 days (95% CI 23.67–28.80) was observed pre-intervention compared to 23.81 days (95% CI 20.13–27.49) during the intervention and 24.69 days (95% CI 22.43–26.95) post-intervention. The overall decrease in median length of stay was associated with the increase in mobility across the sites. Conclusions MOVE increased mobilization and these results were replicated across surgery, psychiatry, medicine, and cardiology inpatient units.
dc.identifier.citationBMC Geriatrics. 2019 Apr 05;19(1):99
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-019-1124-0
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.20381/ruor-23287
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10393/39038
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s).
dc.titleCan the effects of the mobilization of vulnerable elders in Ontario (MOVE ON) implementation be replicated in new settings: an interrupted time series design
dc.typeJournal Article

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail ImageThumbnail Image
Name:
12877_2019_Article_1124.pdf
Size:
789.24 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail ImageThumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
0 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: