Repository logo

Cultural Adaptation of a Shared Decision-Making Intervention to Address the Needs of First Nations, Métis and Inuit Women

dc.contributor.authorJull, Janet
dc.contributor.supervisorStacey, Dawn
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-03T17:56:06Z
dc.date.available2014-10-03T17:56:06Z
dc.date.created2014
dc.date.issued2014
dc.degree.disciplineÉtudes supérieures / Graduate Studies
dc.degree.leveldoctorate
dc.degree.namePhD
dc.description.abstractBackground: Little is known about shared decision-making (SDM) interventions with Aboriginal Peoples. Purpose: To explore Aboriginal women’s SDM needs and engage Aboriginal women in culturally adapting an SDM approach. Methods: Three studies were guided by an advisory group, ethical framework and a postcolonial theoretical lens. 1. A systematic review of the literature to identify health decision-making interventions to support Indigenous Peoples. 2. An interpretive descriptive qualitative study using individual interviews with Aboriginal women to explore decision-making needs. 3. An interpretive descriptive qualitative study to culturally adapt and usability test the Ottawa Personal Decision Guide (OPDG) to support decision making by Aboriginal women. Results: 1. The only eligible intervention study was a randomized control trial conducted in the United States with 44 Indigenous students. Compared to baseline, post-intervention the students demonstrated increased knowledge and use of a four-step decision-making process. 2. Interviews with 13 Aboriginal women supported SDM. Shared decision-making needs were represented by four major themes and presented in a Medicine Wheel framework: To be an active participant; To feel safe with care; Engagement in the decision process; Personal beliefs and community values. Supports for each of the major themes focused on the relational nature of shared decision-making. 3. Aboriginal women participated in two focus groups (n=13) or usability interviews with decision coaching (n=6). For culturally adapting the OPDG seven themes were identified: “This paper makes it hard for me to show that I am capable of making decisions”; “I am responsible for my decisions”; “My past and current experiences affect the way I make decisions”; “People need to talk with people”; “I need to fully participate in making my decisions”; “I need to explore my decision in a meaningful way”; “I need respect for my traditional learning and communication style.” Conclusions: There is little evidence on SDM interventions with Indigenous Peoples. Although Aboriginal women support SDM, they may have unmet decision-making needs. The OPDG was culturally adapted to be combined with decision coaching and needs to be evaluated.
dc.faculty.departmentSanté des populations / Population Health
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10393/31703
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.20381/ruor-6608
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherUniversité d'Ottawa / University of Ottawa
dc.subjectShared decision making
dc.subjectAboriginal
dc.subjectWomen
dc.subjectHealth
dc.subjectFirst Nations
dc.subjectInuit
dc.subjectMétis
dc.subjectCultural adaptation
dc.subjectHealth equity
dc.subjectDecision
dc.titleCultural Adaptation of a Shared Decision-Making Intervention to Address the Needs of First Nations, Métis and Inuit Women
dc.typeThesis
thesis.degree.disciplineÉtudes supérieures / Graduate Studies
thesis.degree.levelDoctoral
thesis.degree.namePhD
uottawa.departmentSanté des populations / Population Health

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail ImageThumbnail Image
Name:
Jull_Janet_2014_thesis.pdf
Size:
5.54 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail ImageThumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
4.07 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: