Repository logo

Accurate GFR in obesity—protocol for a systematic review

dc.contributor.authorSriperumbuduri, Sriram
dc.contributor.authorDent, Robert
dc.contributor.authorMalcolm, Janine
dc.contributor.authorHiremath, Swapnil
dc.contributor.authorKlein, Ran
dc.contributor.authorWhite, Christine A
dc.contributor.authorBrown, Pierre A
dc.contributor.authorAkbari, Ayub
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-24T13:42:12Z
dc.date.available2019-06-24T13:42:12Z
dc.date.issued2019-06-22
dc.date.updated2019-06-24T13:42:12Z
dc.description.abstractAbstract Background Obesity is increasing globally. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is strongly associated with obesity. Kidney function is commonly estimated with equations using creatinine (such as CKD-EPI equation) which is a product of muscle metabolism. Decisions about categorizing CKD, planning modality of renal replacement therapies, and adjusting dosages of medications excreted by the kidneys are done using these equations. However, it is not well appreciated that creatinine-based equations may not accurately estimate kidney function in obese individuals. We plan a systematic review of diagnostic studies which will compare estimating equations to actual measured kidney function. Methods We will systematically search electronic bibliographic databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library with no restrictions on language or specific dates. The search terms will be adapted for the different databases using a combination of Medical Subject Heading and relevant keywords contained in titles and abstracts. Our preliminary search strategy using Cochrane, MEDLINE, and EMBASE databases have identified 190, 1246, and 1660 citations, respectively. For all studies selected, we will extract information on general study characteristics, study participant (age, sex, ethnicity, weight, height, BMI, BSA), type and protocol of reference standard utilized, the index test studied, the methodology of measurement of index test, categories of GFR, the proportion of eGFR within 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50% of measured GFR, and bias between eGFR and measured GFR. If the quality of methods and risk of bias are adequate, we will perform a meta-analysis. We will assess the heterogeneity using the χ2 and the I2 statistics to examine whether the estimates from studies included could be pooled. Sensitivity and multivariate meta-regression analyses will be performed to assess the effects of clinical factors and socio-demographic characteristics reported in included studies on the meta-analytic estimates. All analysis will be performed using the Comprehensive Meta-analysis software. Discussion This systematic review might help to inform clinicians on the best equation to use in patients with obesity and CKD for staging of CKD and for medication dosing. If no equation is deemed suitable, this review will form a basis for future studies of GFR in obese individuals. Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD42018104345
dc.identifier.citationSystematic Reviews. 2019 Jun 22;8(1):147
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-1052-2
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.20381/ruor-23582
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10393/39335
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s).
dc.titleAccurate GFR in obesity—protocol for a systematic review
dc.typeJournal Article

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail ImageThumbnail Image
Name:
13643_2019_Article_1052.pdf
Size:
373.96 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail ImageThumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
0 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: