Upstream solutions for price-gouging on critical generic medicines

dc.contributor.authorHouston, Adam R
dc.contributor.authorBeall, Reed F
dc.contributor.authorAttaran, Amir
dc.date.accessioned2016-05-18T15:42:08Z
dc.date.available2016-05-18T15:42:08Z
dc.date.issued2016-05-02
dc.date.updated2016-05-18T15:42:08Z
dc.description.abstractAbstract Exorbitant price increases for critical off-patent medicines have received considerable media attention in recent months, leading to an investigation by the U.S. Senate. However, much of this attention has focused upon the companies that initiated the price increases, all of whom had recently acquired the drugs in question. Overlooked are upstream interventions with the originators of these drugs to prevent generics trolling in the first place. Using the particular example of Eli Lilly and Company’s efforts to divest itself of cycloserine, a flawed process that paved the way for the recent price hike by Rodelis Therapeutics, this article highlights the responsibilities of drug originators, and safeguards to ensure similar rights transfers do not affect ongoing affordable access.
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice. 2016 May 02;9(1):15
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40545-016-0064-8
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10393/34725
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderHouston et al.
dc.titleUpstream solutions for price-gouging on critical generic medicines

Fichiers

Trousse originale

Voici les éléments 1 - 1 sur 1
En cours de chargement...
Vignette d'image
Nom:
40545_2016_Article_64.pdf
Taille:
387.63 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Trousse de licence

Voici les éléments 1 - 1 sur 1
En cours de chargement...
Vignette d'image
Nom:
license.txt
Taille:
4.92 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: