Repository logo

Duration of Anticoagulant Therapy for Unprovoked Venous Thromboembolism

dc.contributor.authorKhan, Faizan
dc.contributor.supervisorFergusson, Dean
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-17T20:11:01Z
dc.date.available2022-10-17T20:11:01Z
dc.date.issued2022-10-17en_US
dc.description.abstractVenous thromboembolism (VTE) is a chronic illness that affects nearly 10 million people every year worldwide. Anticoagulant therapy with direct oral anticoagulants is the mainstay of treatment for patients with VTE, and should be continued for at least 3-6 months. Thereafter, a decision should be made to discontinue anticoagulation or continue it indefinitely. This decision is most challenging for patients with a first unprovoked VTE because of uncertainty in estimates for the long-term benefits (e.g., reduction in recurrent VTE) and harms (e.g., increase in major bleeding) of extended anticoagulation, and the trade-offs between them. The overarching aim of this doctoral thesis was to address these key evidence gaps that are pertinent to making decisions regarding the duration of anticoagulation for patients with a first unprovoked VTE. The first three studies of this thesis synthesized contemporary and reliable estimates for the long-term risks and consequences of recurrent VTE and major bleeding, with and without extended anticoagulation (parameters that can influence the clinical and cost-effectiveness of discontinuing versus continuing anticoagulation indefinitely). Broadly, these systematic reviews and meta-analyses found that: 1) the long-term risks and consequences of major bleeding during extended anticoagulation are considerable, particularly with vitamin K antagonists as well as in older patients, patients using antiplatelet therapy, and in patients with kidney disease, a history of bleeding, or anemia; and 2) the long-term risks of recurrent VTE during extended anticoagulation and major bleeding after discontinuing anticoagulation are reassuringly low but not negligible. The fourth study incorporated the synthesized evidence to compare the lifetime clinical benefits, harms, and costs of discontinuing versus continuing anticoagulation indefinitely. This decision analytic modelling study showed that indefinite anticoagulation is unlikely to either result in a net clinical benefit or be cost-effective in all (i.e., unselected) patients with a first unprovoked VTE. Findings from this thesis can serve to impact clinical practice and health policy by informing patient prognosis to guide shared decision-making regarding the duration of treatment for unprovoked VTE, and informing future research to ultimately identify which patients should receive anticoagulation indefinitely in order to maximize health benefits for the available healthcare resources.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10393/44163
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.20381/ruor-28376
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversité d'Ottawa / University of Ottawaen_US
dc.subjectDeep Vein Thrombosisen_US
dc.subjectPulmonary Embolismen_US
dc.subjectAnticoagulant Therapyen_US
dc.subjectVenous Thromboembolismen_US
dc.titleDuration of Anticoagulant Therapy for Unprovoked Venous Thromboembolismen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
thesis.degree.disciplineMédecine / Medicineen_US
thesis.degree.levelDoctoralen_US
thesis.degree.namePhDen_US
uottawa.departmentÉpidémiologie et santé publique / Epidemiology and Public Healthen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail ImageThumbnail Image
Name:
Khan_Faizan_2022_thesis.pdf
Size:
2.7 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail ImageThumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
6.65 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: