Repository logo

Early versus delayed enteral nutrition in mechanically ventilated patients with circulatory shock: a nested cohort analysis of an international multicenter, pragmatic clinical trial

dc.contributor.authorOrtiz-Reyes, Luis
dc.contributor.authorPatel, Jayshil J.
dc.contributor.authorJiang, Xuran
dc.contributor.authorCoz Yataco, Angel
dc.contributor.authorDay, Andrew G.
dc.contributor.authorShah, Faraaz
dc.contributor.authorZelten, James
dc.contributor.authorTamae-Kakazu, Maximiliano
dc.contributor.authorRice, Todd
dc.contributor.authorHeyland, Daren K.
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-14T03:26:21Z
dc.date.available2022-06-14T03:26:21Z
dc.date.issued2022-06-09
dc.date.updated2022-06-14T03:26:21Z
dc.description.abstractAbstract Introduction Real-world evidence on the timing and efficacy of enteral nutrition (EN) practices in intensive care unit (ICU) patients with circulatory shock is limited. We hypothesized early EN (EEN), as compared to delayed EN (DEN), is associated with improved clinical outcomes in mechanically ventilated (MV) patients with circulatory shock. Methods We analyzed a dataset from an international, multicenter, pragmatic randomized clinical trial (RCT) evaluating protein dose in ICU patients. Data were collected from ICU admission, and EEN was defined as initiating < 48 h from ICU admission and DEN > 48 h. We identified MV patients in circulatory shock to evaluate the association between the timing of EN initiation and clinical outcomes. The regression analysis model controlled for age, mNUTRIC score, APACHE II score, sepsis, and Site. Results We included 626 patients, from 52 ICUs in 14 countries. Median age was 60 years [18–93], 55% had septic shock, 99% received norepinephrine alone, 91% received EN alone, and 50.3% were randomized to a usual protein dose. Forty-two percent of EEN patients had persistent organ dysfunction syndrome plus death at day 28, compared to 53% in the DEN group (p = 0.04). EEN was associated with more ICU-free days (9.3 ± 9.2 vs. 5.7 ± 7.9, p = 0.0002), more days alive and free of vasopressors (7.1 ± 3.1 vs. 6.3 ± 3.2, p = 0.007), and shorter duration of MV among survivors (9.8 ± 10.9 vs. 13.8 ± 14.5, p = 0.0002). This trend was no longer observed in the adjusted analysis. There were no differences in ICU/60-day mortality or feeding intolerance rates between groups. Conclusion In MV patients with circulatory shock, EEN, as compared to DEN, was associated with improved clinical outcomes, but no longer when adjusting for illness severity. RCTs comparing the efficacy of EEN to DEN in MV patients with circulatory shock are warranted.
dc.identifier.citationCritical Care. 2022 Jun 09;26(1):173
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-022-04047-4
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.20381/ruor-27910
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10393/43696
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)
dc.titleEarly versus delayed enteral nutrition in mechanically ventilated patients with circulatory shock: a nested cohort analysis of an international multicenter, pragmatic clinical trial
dc.typeJournal Article

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail ImageThumbnail Image
Name:
13054_2022_Article_4047.pdf
Size:
1.41 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail ImageThumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
0 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: