The Role of Growing Degree-Days in Explaining Lepidoptera Species Distributions at Broad Scales

Abstract

Understanding how climate determines species’ geographic distributions is an important question in ecology with direct implications for predicting climate change-driven range shifts. For Lepidoptera, growing degree-days, a measure of growing season length, has been shown to be an important predictor of species’ distributions in some cases. Most studies use a standardized estimate of base development temperature in their calculations of growing degree-days instead of a species-specific threshold so past investigations of the influence of growing degree-days on Lepidoptera distributions may not have been optimal. Species distribution models (SDMs) are a commonly used approach in ecology that typically only implicitly capture the underlying processes that limit a species’ distribution. A species-specific estimate of growing degree-days should better characterize these processes than standard thermal thresholds and thus improve the accuracy of species distribution models. In this thesis, I use species distribution modelling to model the geographic distribution of 30 moth species native to North America. I ask whether a) growing degree-days are the best climatic predictor of these moth species distributions at broad scales; b) a lab-estimated biological threshold (i.e., BDT) can scale up and improve the predictive ability of SDMs; and c) the quality of experiments used to estimate species-specific BDT influences the predictive accuracy of SDMs. To do so, I compare the predictive accuracy of a correlative model based on a commonly-used thermal threshold to define growing degree-days to a hybrid model with degree-days defined based on a species-specific thermal threshold. I found that the predictive performance of the hybrid models was indistinguishable from the correlative models likely because growing degree-days was not the best climatic predictor of the geographic distributions of the majority of these moth species. I also found that there was no link between the quality of the lab experiments and the difference in performance of the hybrid and correlative models. My findings suggest that lab-estimated thermal thresholds may not always scale up to be predictive at a broad scale and that more work is needed to leverage the data from lab experiments into broad scale SDMs. Determining the ultimate factors that limit species’ distributions will be critical in accurately predicting species’ range shifts response to future climate change.