Repository logo

PTSD is not the emblematic disorder of the COVID-19 pandemic; adjustment disorder is

dc.contributor.authorBrunet, Alain
dc.contributor.authorRivest-Beauregard, Marjolaine
dc.contributor.authorLonergan, Michelle
dc.contributor.authorCipolletta, Sabrina
dc.contributor.authorRasmussen, Andrew
dc.contributor.authorMeng, Xiangfei
dc.contributor.authorJaafari, Nematollah
dc.contributor.authorRomero, Sara
dc.contributor.authorSuperka, Julia
dc.contributor.authorBrown, Adam D.
dc.contributor.authorSapkota, Ram P.
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-03T03:58:29Z
dc.date.available2022-05-03T03:58:29Z
dc.date.issued2022-04-28
dc.date.updated2022-05-03T03:58:29Z
dc.description.abstractAbstract Background Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) has been hailed by some as the emblematic mental disorder of the COVID-19 pandemic, assuming that PTSD’s life-threat criterion was met de facto. More plausible outcomes like adjustment disorder (AD) have been overlooked. Methods An online cross-sectional survey was launched in the initial stage of the pandemic using a convenience sample of 5 913 adults to compare the prevalence of COVID-related probable PTSD versus probable AD. The abridged Impact of Event Scale – Revised (IES-6) assessed the severity of trauma- and stressor-related symptoms over the previous week. Demographic and pandemic-related data (e.g., receiving a formal diagnosis of COVID-19, job loss, loss of loved one, confinement, material hardship) were collected. A Classification and Regression Tree analysis was conducted to uncover the pandemic experiences leading to clinical ‘caseness’. Caseness was defined by a score > 9 on the IES-6 symptom measure and further characterized as PTSD or AD depending on whether the Peritraumatic Distress Inventory’s life-threat item was endorsed or not. Results The participants were predominantly Caucasian (72.8%), women (79.2%), with a university degree (85%), and a mean age of 42.22 (SD = 15.24) years; 3 647 participants (61.7%; 95%CI [60.4, 63.0]) met the threshold for caseness. However, when perceived life-threat was accounted for, only 6.7% (95%CI [6.1, 7.4]) were classified as PTSD cases, and 55% (95%CI [53.7, 56.2]) as AD cases. Among the AD cases, three distinct profiles emerged marked by the following: (i) a worst personal pandemic experience eliciting intense fear, helplessness or horror (in the absence, however, of any life-threat), (ii) a pandemic experience eliciting sadness/grief, and (iii) worrying intensely about the safety of significant others. Conclusions Studies considering the life-threat criterion as met de facto during the pandemic are confusing PTSD for AD on most counts. This misconception is obscuring the various AD-related idioms of distress that have emerged during the pandemic and the actual treatment needs.
dc.identifier.citationBMC Psychiatry. 2022 Apr 28;22(1):300
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-03903-5
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.20381/ruor-27759
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10393/43544
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)
dc.titlePTSD is not the emblematic disorder of the COVID-19 pandemic; adjustment disorder is
dc.typeJournal Article

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail ImageThumbnail Image
Name:
12888_2022_Article_3903.pdf
Size:
1.25 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail ImageThumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
0 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: