Repository logo

Applying psychological theories to evidence-based clinical practice: identifying factors predictive of placing preventive fissure sealants

dc.contributor.authorBonetti, Debbie
dc.contributor.authorJohnston, Marie
dc.contributor.authorClarkson, Jan E
dc.contributor.authorGrimshaw, Jeremy
dc.contributor.authorPitts, Nigel B
dc.contributor.authorEccles, Martin
dc.contributor.authorSteen, Nick
dc.contributor.authorThomas, Ruth
dc.contributor.authorMaclennan, Graeme
dc.contributor.authorGlidewell, Liz
dc.contributor.authorWalker, Anne
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-18T10:57:09Z
dc.date.available2015-12-18T10:57:09Z
dc.date.issued2010-04-08
dc.date.updated2015-12-18T10:57:09Z
dc.description.abstractAbstract Background Psychological models are used to understand and predict behaviour in a wide range of settings, but have not been consistently applied to health professional behaviours, and the contribution of differing theories is not clear. This study explored the usefulness of a range of models to predict an evidence-based behaviour -- the placing of fissure sealants. Methods Measures were collected by postal questionnaire from a random sample of general dental practitioners (GDPs) in Scotland. Outcomes were behavioural simulation (scenario decision-making), and behavioural intention. Predictor variables were from the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB), Social Cognitive Theory (SCT), Common Sense Self-regulation Model (CS-SRM), Operant Learning Theory (OLT), Implementation Intention (II), Stage Model, and knowledge (a non-theoretical construct). Multiple regression analysis was used to examine the predictive value of each theoretical model individually. Significant constructs from all theories were then entered into a 'cross theory' stepwise regression analysis to investigate their combined predictive value Results Behavioural simulation - theory level variance explained was: TPB 31%; SCT 29%; II 7%; OLT 30%. Neither CS-SRM nor stage explained significant variance. In the cross theory analysis, habit (OLT), timeline acute (CS-SRM), and outcome expectancy (SCT) entered the equation, together explaining 38% of the variance. Behavioural intention - theory level variance explained was: TPB 30%; SCT 24%; OLT 58%, CS-SRM 27%. GDPs in the action stage had significantly higher intention to place fissure sealants. In the cross theory analysis, habit (OLT) and attitude (TPB) entered the equation, together explaining 68% of the variance in intention. Summary The study provides evidence that psychological models can be useful in understanding and predicting clinical behaviour. Taking a theory-based approach enables the creation of a replicable methodology for identifying factors that may predict clinical behaviour and so provide possible targets for knowledge translation interventions. Results suggest that more evidence-based behaviour may be achieved by influencing beliefs about the positive outcomes of placing fissure sealants and building a habit of placing them as part of patient management. However a number of conceptual and methodological challenges remain.
dc.identifier.citationImplementation Science. 2010 Apr 08;5(1):25
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-25
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10393/33863
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderBonetti et al.
dc.titleApplying psychological theories to evidence-based clinical practice: identifying factors predictive of placing preventive fissure sealants
dc.typeJournal Article

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail ImageThumbnail Image
Name:
13012_2009_Article_239.pdf
Size:
738.76 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail ImageThumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
4.92 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: