Repository logo

What do primary care providers want to know when caring for patients living with frailty? An analysis of eConsult communications between primary care providers and specialists

dc.contributor.authorKarunananthan, Sathya
dc.contributor.authorBonacci, Giovanni
dc.contributor.authorFung, Celeste
dc.contributor.authorHuang, Allen
dc.contributor.authorRobert, Benoit
dc.contributor.authorMcCutcheon, Tess
dc.contributor.authorHoughton, Deanne
dc.contributor.authorHakimjavadi, Ramtin
dc.contributor.authorKeely, Erin
dc.contributor.authorLiddy, Clare
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-16T04:27:16Z
dc.date.available2024-01-16T04:27:16Z
dc.date.issued2024-01-16
dc.date.updated2024-01-16T04:27:16Z
dc.description.abstractAbstract Background Frailty is a complex condition that primary care providers (PCPs) are managing in increasing numbers, yet there is no clear guidance or training for frailty care. Objectives The present study examined eConsult questions PCPs asked specialists about patients with frailty, the specialists’ responses, and the impact of eConsult on the care of these patients. Design Cross-sectional observational study. Setting ChamplainBASE™ eConsult located in Eastern Ontario, Canada. Participants Sixty one eConsult cases closed by PCPs in 2019 that use the terms “frail” or “frailty” to describe patients 65 years of age or older. Measurements The Taxonomy of Generic Clinical Questions (TGCQ) was used to classify PCP questions and the International Classification for Primary Care 3 (ICPC-3) was used to classify the clinical content of each eConsult. The impact of eConsult on patient care was measured by PCP responses to a mandatory survey. Results PCPs most frequently directed their questions to cardiology (n = 7; 11%), gastroenterology (n = 7; 11%), and endocrinology (n = 6; 10%). Specialist answers most often pertained to medications (n = 63, 46%), recommendations for clinical investigation (n = 24, 17%), and diagnoses (n = 22, 16%). Specialist responses resulted in PCPs avoiding referral in 57% (n = 35) of cases whereas referrals were still required in 15% (n = 9) of cases. Specialists responded to eConsults in a median 1.11 days (IQR = 0.3–4.7), and 95% (n = 58) of cases received a response within 7 days. Specialists recorded a median of 15 min to respond (IQR = 10–20), with a median cost of $50.00 CAD (IQR = 33.33 – 66.66) per eConsult. Conclusions Through the analysis of questions and responses submitted to eConsult, this study provides novel information on PCP knowledge gaps and approaches to care for patients living with frailty. Furthermore, these analyses provide evidence that eConsult is a feasible and valuable tool for improving care for patients with frailty in primary care settings.
dc.identifier.citationBMC Health Services Research. 2024 Jan 16;24(1):76
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-10542-x
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.20381/ruor-30047
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10393/45843
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)
dc.titleWhat do primary care providers want to know when caring for patients living with frailty? An analysis of eConsult communications between primary care providers and specialists
dc.typeJournal Article

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail ImageThumbnail Image
Name:
12913_2024_Article_10542.pdf
Size:
1.3 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail ImageThumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
0 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: