Comparative Effectiveness of Local Application of Chlorhexidine Gluconate, Mupirocin Ointment, and Normal Saline for the Prevention of Peritoneal Dialysis-related Infections (COSMO-PD Trial): a multicenter randomized, double-blind, controlled protocol
| dc.contributor.author | Nochaiwong, Surapon | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ruengorn, Chidchanok | |
| dc.contributor.author | Noppakun, Kajohnsak | |
| dc.contributor.author | Panyathong, Setthapon | |
| dc.contributor.author | Dandecha, Phongsak | |
| dc.contributor.author | Sood, Manish M | |
| dc.contributor.author | Saenjum, Chalermpong | |
| dc.contributor.author | Awiphan, Ratanaporn | |
| dc.contributor.author | Sirilun, Sasithorn | |
| dc.contributor.author | Mongkhon, Pajaree | |
| dc.contributor.author | Chongruksut, Wilaiwan | |
| dc.contributor.author | Thavorn, Kednapa | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2019-12-22T05:19:50Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2019-12-22T05:19:50Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2019-12-19 | |
| dc.date.updated | 2019-12-22T05:19:50Z | |
| dc.description.abstract | Abstract Background Current international guidelines recommend the use of a daily topical exit-site antimicrobial to prevent peritoneal dialysis (PD)-related infections. Although nonantibiotic-based therapies are appealing because they may limit antimicrobial resistance, no controlled trials have been conducted to compare topical antimicrobial agents with usual exit-site care for the prevention of PD-related infections among the Thai PD population. We propose a controlled three-arm trial to examine the efficacy and safety of a daily chlorhexidine gluconate-impregnated patch versus mupirocin ointment versus usual exit-site care with normal saline for the prevention of PD-related infections. Methods/Designs This study is a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, active-controlled, clinical trial. Adult patients aged 18 years or older who have end-stage kidney disease and are undergoing PD will be enrolled at three PD Centers in Thailand. A total of 354 PD patients will be randomly assigned to either the 2% chlorhexidine gluconate-impregnated patch, mupirocin ointment, or usual exit-site care with normal saline dressing according to a computer-generated random allocation sequence. Participants will be followed until discontinuation of PD or completion of 24 months. The primary study outcomes are time to first PD-related infection (exit-site/tunnel infection or peritonitis) event and the overall difference in PD-related infection rates between study arms. Secondary study outcomes will include (i) the rate of infection-related catheter removal and PD technique failure, (ii) rate of nasal and exit-site Staphylococcus aureus colonization, (iii) healthcare costs, and (iv) skin reactions and adverse events. We plan to conduct a cost-utility analysis alongside the trial from the perspectives of patients and society. A Markov simulation model will be used to estimate the total cost and health outcome in terms of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) over a 20-year time horizon. An incremental cost-effectiveness ratio in Thai Baht and U.S. dollars per QALYs gained will be illustrated. A series of probabilistic sensitivity analyses will be conducted to assess the robustness of the cost-utility analysis findings. Discussion The results from this study will provide new clinical and cost-effectiveness evidence to support the best strategy for the prevention of PD-related infections among the Thai PD population. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02547103. Registered on September 11, 2015. | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Trials. 2019 Dec 19;20(1):754 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3953-8 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.20381/ruor-24239 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10393/40000 | |
| dc.language.rfc3066 | en | |
| dc.rights.holder | The Author(s). | |
| dc.title | Comparative Effectiveness of Local Application of Chlorhexidine Gluconate, Mupirocin Ointment, and Normal Saline for the Prevention of Peritoneal Dialysis-related Infections (COSMO-PD Trial): a multicenter randomized, double-blind, controlled protocol | |
| dc.type | Journal Article |
