Repository logo

Dyadic attachment-based therapies for infants and young children with mental health problems: a scoping review

dc.contributor.authorMatheson, Katherine
dc.contributor.authorde Schaetzen, Constance
dc.contributor.authorLi, Adrienne
dc.contributor.authorSheridan, Nicole
dc.contributor.authorHolahan, Anne-Lise
dc.contributor.authorTighe, Alexandra
dc.contributor.authorSalamatmanesh, Mina
dc.contributor.authorVloet, Melissa
dc.contributor.authorCloutier, Paula
dc.contributor.authorHelleman, Amanda
dc.contributor.authorCurrie, Lisa
dc.contributor.authorRacine, Nicole
dc.contributor.authorSaadat, Sevda
dc.contributor.authorPajer, Kathleen
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-18T04:56:22Z
dc.date.available2025-11-18T04:56:22Z
dc.date.issued2025-11-12
dc.date.updated2025-11-18T04:56:22Z
dc.description.abstractAbstract Introduction Early child-caregiver attachment is foundational to mental health (MH). While prevention efforts often aim to improve attachment quality, clinicians frequently encounter infants and young children already exhibiting clinical symptoms of MH disorders. A comprehensive summary of attachment-based dyadic interventions for this population is lacking. This scoping review aims to address this gap. Methods We conducted a scoping review of CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Cochrane CENTRAL and hand-searched articles to identify and characterize dyadic, relationship-based interventions for children aged 0–6 years with clinical symptoms of MH disorders. Studies were screened for eligibility and included if they examined therapeutic modalities used in clinical populations beyond preventive approaches. Results Screening identified studies that evaluated several therapeutic modalities, e.g., Parent Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT), Early Pathways (EP), Watch, Wait, and Wonder, Parent-Infant Psychotherapy, and Video Feedback Interventions. PCIT and EP had the most published data, treated the largest number of participants, and demonstrated significant improvements in child or relational outcomes. However, most studies had small sample sizes and methodological limitations. Only a few interventions had been evaluated using rigorous designs such as randomized controlled trials. Conclusions Two interventions that had the most evidence were EP and PCIT, particularly for families affected by adverse social determinants of health. Both require further research to explore barriers for implementation (e.g., adaptability in multiple settings and cultures, lessen resources required for service delivery, etc.). Additional research is needed to strengthen the evidence base for dyadic, attachment-based treatments targeting clinical MH concerns in infants and young children.
dc.identifier.citationChild and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health. 2025 Nov 12;19(1):124
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13034-025-00981-7
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10393/51051
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)
dc.titleDyadic attachment-based therapies for infants and young children with mental health problems: a scoping review
dc.typeJournal Article

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail ImageThumbnail Image
Name:
13034_2025_Article_981.pdf
Size:
2.19 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail ImageThumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.26 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: