Repository logo

Seed Governance in Tanzania: Seed Capitalism, Pluralism, and Sovereignty Discourses Compared, and the Value of Nuance

dc.contributor.authorMoore, Karen
dc.contributor.supervisorHuggins, Christopher
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-03T18:35:58Z
dc.date.available2019-01-03T18:35:58Z
dc.date.issued2019-01-03en_US
dc.description.abstractThis thesis explores debates around seed governance in the context of Tanzania’s recent changes to its seed policies and laws, in order to critically examine the framings and discourses employed. Three narratives emerge, Seed Capitalism, Seed Pluralism, and Seed Sovereignty. Consistent with Westengen (2017), Seed Capitalism and Seed Sovereignty rely on, and are entrenched in, binary opposition, despite the complexity of the problems involved, and put forward singular solutions that risk harming smallholder resilience. Seed Capitalism portrays scientist-bred certified seed as superior to farmer varieties, and as optimal for smallholders, despite evidence to the contrary. Seed Sovereignty constructs rigid distinctions between peasant seeds and industrial seeds, failing to engage with the phenomenon of creolized seed, the intermixing of farmer varieties with scientist-bred varieties. Creolized seed presents a narrative threat to Seed Sovereignty’s rejection of industrial seed. Both Seed Capitalism and Seed Sovereignty narratives obscure evidence relating to seed quality and yield that is in tension with their underlying agendas. A third discourse, Seed Pluralism, not previously identified as such by the literature, resists binary framings and recommends a multiplicity of approaches informed by the nuance of relevant facts. Tanzania’s seed governance framework predominantly reflects the Seed Capitalism discourse. While Seed Pluralism has a small foothold in Tanzania’s seed governance, through the Quality Declared Seed (QDS) system, overall Tanzania’s seed laws are threatening smallholder resilience. Positive reform under Tanzania’s current political settlement is unlikely. Pro-poor donors should withdraw support for governance frameworks rooted in Seed Capitalism, and instead promote seed governance reforms grounded in Seed Pluralism, including eliminating restrictions on smallholder seed exchange in low income countries.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10393/38627
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.20381/ruor-22879
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversité d'Ottawa / University of Ottawaen_US
dc.subjectSeed Governanceen_US
dc.subjectFarmers' Rightsen_US
dc.subjectUPOVen_US
dc.subjectTanzaniaen_US
dc.subjectITPGRFAen_US
dc.subjectFarmers' Seed Exchangeen_US
dc.subjectAgrobiodiversityen_US
dc.titleSeed Governance in Tanzania: Seed Capitalism, Pluralism, and Sovereignty Discourses Compared, and the Value of Nuanceen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
thesis.degree.disciplineSciences sociales / Social Sciencesen_US
thesis.degree.levelMastersen_US
thesis.degree.nameMAen_US
uottawa.departmentDéveloppement international et mondialisation / International Development and Global Studiesen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail ImageThumbnail Image
Name:
Moore_Karen_2018_thesis.pdf
Size:
2.98 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Moore_Karen_2018_thesis.pdf

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail ImageThumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
6.65 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: