Repository logo

Impact of reflective torque tube on rear side irradiance in bifacial photovoltaic modules

dc.contributor.authorCoathup, Trevor J.
dc.contributor.authorLewis, Mandy R.
dc.contributor.authorRussell, Annie C. J.
dc.contributor.authorConesa, Alejandro
dc.contributor.authorGuerrero-Perez, Javier
dc.contributor.authorValdivia, Christopher E.
dc.contributor.authorHinzer, Karin
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-26T16:12:46Z
dc.date.available2022-04-26T16:12:46Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractNon-uniform irradiance on the rear side of bifacial photovoltaic (PV) modules causes electrical mismatch between cells and energy loss across the module. Racking structures increase this non-uniformity through shadows and reflections that vary throughout the day. However, commercial software typically use constant values to estimate mismatch losses in annual simulations. We investigate the impact of torque tube shading and reflection on rear side irradiance mismatch in bifacial PV modules in one-in-portrait (1P) and two-in-portrait (2P) horizontal single-axis trackers with a range of ground albedos over a typical meteorological year in Livermore, California, USA. Irradiance simulations use a version of bifacial_radiance, the National Renewable Energy Laboratory’s python wrapper for the RADIANCE ray tracing software, which we modified for arbitrary 2D irradiance sampling of the module(s) under investigation. For a torque tube reflectivity of 0.745, torque tube reflection accounts for 3.0% and 5.5% of the annual rear insolation in 1P and 2P configurations, respectively, for a 0.2 albedo; or 2.9% and 3.1% for a 0.6 albedo. Torque tube reflection decreases annual rear insolation mismatch from 11.8% to 10.7% in 1P configurations, and from 11.5% to 9.8% in 2P configurations with 0.2 albedo. Similarly, with 0.6 albedo, annual rear insolation mismatch decreases from 12.6% to 11.6% in 1P configurations, and from 11.9% to 10.4% in 2P configurations. However, we demonstrate that annual figures are insufficient for capturing the impact of torque tube reflection; seasonal and diurnal variations must also be considered.en_US
dc.identifier.citationT. J. Coathup, M. R. Lewis, A. C. J. Russell, A. Conesa, J. Guerrero-Perez, C. E. Valdivia, K. Hinzeren_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1117/12.2615658en_US
dc.identifier.isbn9781510648630en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.spiedigitallibrary.org/conference-proceedings-of-SPIE/11996en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10393/43517
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.20381/ruor-27732
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectAnnual energy yield modellingen_US
dc.subjectRay tracingen_US
dc.subjectSingle axis trackingen_US
dc.subjectSilicon moduleen_US
dc.subjectRear shadingen_US
dc.subjectGlobal irradianceen_US
dc.subjectGround albedoen_US
dc.subjectPV system rackingen_US
dc.titleImpact of reflective torque tube on rear side irradiance in bifacial photovoltaic modulesen_US
dc.typeConference Proceedingen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Loading...
Thumbnail ImageThumbnail Image
Name:
TrevorCoathup_PhotonicsWest2022_presentation.mp4
Size:
268.06 MB
Format:
MP4 Container format for video files
Loading...
Thumbnail ImageThumbnail Image
Name:
PhWest2022_Proceedings_TC_final.pdf
Size:
1.43 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail ImageThumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
4.92 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: