Evaluation of an Advanced Practice Nurse Led Inter-professional Collaborative Chronic Care Approach for Kidney Transplant Patients: The TARGET Study
Loading...
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Université d'Ottawa / University of Ottawa
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of an Advanced Practice Nurse (APN)
led inter-professional collaborative chronic care approach on the achievement of clinical outcomes
for adult kidney transplant chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients, as compared to a traditional
transplant nephrologist led approach in one Canadian hospital transplant setting.
Methods: In this non-randomized, controlled study guided by the Chronic Care Model (CCM), a
propensity-score matched analysis was used to control for confounding variables and potential
selection bias. The propensity-score model included the co-variates: a) estimated glomerular
filtration rate, b) age, c) sex, d) kidney donor type, and e) diagnosis of diabetes. Based on the
CCM elements and CKD clinical practice guidelines, the intervention included strategies for
patient disease self-management, end-stage renal disease shared decision-making, healthcare
system re-organization, and clinical decision support. The primary outcome was the proportion of
patients achieving a target score of 78% (7 out of 9 targets), based on the recommended standards
and patient participation in discussions about ESRD options.
Results: Targets included blood pressure, serum lipids, hemoglobin, phosphate, calcium,
parathyroid hormone levels, acid-base balance and clinical practice guideline standards.
Propensity-score matching of 61 intervention patients to 119 controls, resulted in 40 pairs with an
equivalent balance of measured co-variates. Compared to the control group, a greater proportion
of intervention patients achieved the target score (68% versus 10%, p=0.0001), participated in endstage
renal disease shared decision-making (88% versus 13%, p=0.0001), and had clinical practice
guideline treatments implemented (ASA 50% versus 23%, p=0.01; ACE-I/ARB 53% versus 13%,
p=0.004; statins 80% versus 45%, p=0.004). Compared to the intervention group, the control
patients experienced a higher incidence of all cause hospital admissions (35 versus 12, IRR 0.34,
p=0.02) and emergency department visits (40 versus 21, IRR 0.53, p=0.001).Conclusions: A CCM based, APN-led approach to care improves both the processes and
outcomes of care for kidney transplant CKD patients.
