Jones, Lori K2012-08-272012-08-2720122012http://hdl.handle.net/10393/23212http://dx.doi.org/10.20381/ruor-5956This thesis examines whether and how historians’ reliance on medical treatises has limited the historiography of contagion as it relates to fourteenth through sixteenth century England. It analyses the context, contents, audience, and codicology of six English tractates, four on the plague and two on the sweating sickness. Before the early seventeenth century, most English tractates were translations/adaptations of Continental works, with ‘uniquely English’ content added. Although the plague dominates studies of pre-modern disease, focusing on the plague hinders comparative analyses that can reveal much about contemporary understanding of contagion. The socio-political-professional contexts in which the tractates were written and disseminated affected their contents, circulation and, ultimately, audiences. Although largely ignored by historians, the tractates’ prefatory dedications, together with their codicology, reveals that the texts were likely accessible to non-elite audiences. Rather than being limited to its medical sense, contagion formed part of the larger discourse about the human condition.enplague tractatesplaguesweating sicknessEnglandlate medievalearly moderncontagioncontagious diseasehistory of medicinemedical treatisesliteracy/readingcodicologyJohn CaiusThomas le ForestierThomas MoultonThomas PhayerCanutusBL Additional MS 27582BL Sloane MS 3489professional conflictsocio-political conflictfifteenth centurysixteenth centuryThesis