Boyes, Alison2011-04-192011-04-1920112011http://hdl.handle.net/10393/19896http://dx.doi.org/10.20381/ruor-4520This research considers the place of media in society by means of a Foucaudian genealogy of welfare and neo-liberal discourse surrounding youth misconduct in two Toronto newspapers. It was found that the overall “mode of talking” about youth misconduct has shifted from welfare to neo-liberal discourse, and that resistance or critical thought surrounding current neo-liberal discourse emerges in The Globe and Mail. I explore the role of newspapers in the process of governance by analyzing these discourses in terms of Foucault’s three rationalities for “the art of government” and also by analyzing the knowledge produced or titillated and the power outcomes or effects of these discourses. It is argued that newspapers can benefit governance by reflecting, validating and perhaps even rendering current neo-liberal governmentalities more efficient, by encouraging non-government groups to assist in the management of youth misconduct.enportrayals of youth misconduct and misbehaving youthgovernmentalityrisktitillationthe youth superpredatorneo-liberalism, welfare era, responsibilization, resistance or contestation and strategies of governancethe media’s relationship to societyagencyThesis