Building common understanding: seeking consensus and defining social prescribing across contexts – a collective commentary on a Delphi study

Muhl, CaitlinMulligan, KateGiurca, Bogdan C.Polley, Marie J.Bloch, GaryNowak, Dominik A.Osborn-Forde, CharlotteHsiung, SoniaLee, Kheng H.Herrmann, Wolfram J.Baker, James R.Stokes-Lampard, Dame H. J.Everington, Sir S.Dixon, MichaelWachsmuth, IsabelleFigueiredo, CristianoSkjerning, Halfdan T.Rojatz, DanielaChen, Yu-DaHeijnders, Miriam L.Wallace, CarolynHowarth, MichelleWatanabe, DaisukeBertotti, MarcelloJansson, Anu H.Althini, SusannaHolzinger, FelixDooler, Darren G.Brand, SiânAnfilogoff, Tim J.Fancourt, DaisyNelson, Michelle L. A.Tierney, StephanieLeitch, AlisonNam, Hae-KweunCard, Kiffer G.Hayes, DanielSlade, SiânEssam, Marie A.Palmer, Gay A.Welch, Vivian A.Robinson, DavidHilsgen, LaurieTaylor, NiallNielsen, Rasmus Ø.Vidovic, DraganaMcDaid, Emer M.Hoffmeister, Louíse V.Bonehill, JillSiegel, AlanBártová, AlžbětaAcurio-Páez, DavidMendive, Juan M.Husk, Kerryn2024-10-292024-10-292024-10-24BMC Health Services Research. 2024 Oct 24;24(1):1280https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-11603-xhttp://hdl.handle.net/10393/49804Abstract Social prescribing has become a global phenomenon. A Delphi study was recently conducted with 48 social prescribing experts from 26 countries to establish global agreement on the definition of social prescribing. We reflect on the use and utility of the outputs of this work, and where we go from here.Building common understanding: seeking consensus and defining social prescribing across contexts – a collective commentary on a Delphi study2024-10-29enThe Author(s)