Chambers, Stuart2013-09-052013-09-0520112011La revue de sciences des religions d’Ottawa // Ottawa Journal of Religion. 2011(3): 61-86http://hdl.handle.net/10393/26052From 1988-1995 the majority of physicians within the Canadian Medical Association supported the prohibition against an intentionally hastened death for the terminally ill. Their main concerns entailed the “slippery slope” of the Dutch medical model and a possible return to Nazi eugenics. However, empirical evidence from this time period did not support physicians’ fears of decriminalization. Therefore, it is important to understand why doctors, known for their reliance on empiricism and rational thought, reverted to uncritical and profoundly held beliefs when it came to discussions over statesanctioned euthanasia and assisted suicide. This paper suggests that two motives were pivotal in shaping Canadian doctors’ attitudes toward prohibition: the influence of religion and a lack of exposure to cross-cultural perspectives.eneuthanasiaphysician-assisted suicide“slippery slope”HollandRemmelink ReportNazi eugenicsCanadian Medical Associationsanctity of lifereligious attitudescultureArticle