Pick, Frances R.,Basu, Ben Kumar.2009-03-252009-03-2519971997Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 58-09, Section: B, page: 4595.9780612209923http://hdl.handle.net/10393/10146http://dx.doi.org/10.20381/ruor-8149The factors regulating the development and trophic interactions of planktonic communities were determined in 31 medium to large size temperate rivers. In addition, the Rideau River, Ontario, was studied in detail over three field seasons. Variables measured included: phytoplankton biomass as measured by chlorophyll $\alpha$ concentration; zooplankton biomass (rotifers and crustaceans); heterotrophic bacterial abundance; heterotrophic flagellate abundance; nutrient concentrations (phosphorus and nitrogen); dissolved organic carbon concentration; river discharge; water residence time; depth; temperature; and light attenuation. Phytoplankton was abundant in eutrophic rivers ($>$15 $\mu$g L$\sp{-1}$ of chlorophyll a) and was most strongly related to nutrient concentrations, primarily total phosphorus, which explained up to 76% of the variation in chlorophyll a. Phytoplankton biomass in the rivers was not related to the hydrological parameters of water residence time or discharge, possibly due to the short generation time of phytoplankton (hours to days). Light did not appear to limit phytoplankton biomass due to shallow depths and extensive vertical mixing. In the Rideau River phytoplankton biomass exhibited longitudinal heterogeneity, but in general increased in a downstream direction, concomitant with increases in nutrient concentrations. Phytoplankton biomass did not appear to be affected by zooplankton grazing in the rivers. However, phytoplankton biomass may have been negatively impacted by benthic filter feeders, in particular the invasive zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha), in the downstream reaches of the Rideau River. Zooplankton biomass in the rivers was low (usually 20 $\mu$g L$\sp{-1}$ dry mass) and small taxa dominated the zooplankton communities (e.g. rotifers, bosminids). Large zooplankton taxa, such as Daphnia sp., were much less abundant. Due to longer generation times (days to weeks), zooplankton biomass was primarily related to water residence time which explained 33% of the variation. Zooplankton appeared susceptible to advective loss in the rivers. A positive resource effect of either nutrients or phytoplankton on zooplankton biomass, typically observed in lakes, was weaker in the rivers. In comparison to lakes, zooplankton appeared less tightly coupled to phytoplankton. As with phytoplankton, zooplankton biomass in the Rideau River increased with downstream travel and appeared to be negatively affected by benthic filter feeders. Heterotrophic bacteria were abundant in the rivers (4.5 $\times$ 10$\sp6$ cells ml$\sp{-1})$ and, as in lakes, bacteria were most strongly related to nutrient concentrations (total phosphorus) and phytoplankton biomass (chlorophyll a). In contrast to lakes, no relationship between bacterial abundance and dissolved organic carbon was observed, possibly due to the more allochthonous, refractory nature of river dissolved organic carbon. Heterotrophic flagellates were also abundant in the rivers $(4.0\times10\sp{3}$ cells ml$\sp{-1})$ and were most strongly related to bacterial abundance and nutrient concentrations (total phosphorus). Neither bacterial nor flagellate abundance was related to water residence time. A negative relationship between zooplankton biomass and bacterial or flagellate abundance was not observed, possibly because of the low biomass (hence low grazing pressure) of zooplankton in the rivers. Due to the scarcity of zooplankton in rivers, there may be little transfer of energy from the planktonic microbial food web to planktonic metazoans.212 p.Biology, Ecology.Thesis