Tremblay-Pepin, Simon2026-03-172026-03-172022-05-25Tremblay-Pepin, S. (2022). Five Criteria to Evaluate Democratic Economic Planning Models. Review of Radical Political Economics, 54(3), 265-280.0486-6134https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/04866134221093747https://doi.org/10.1177/04866134221093747http://hdl.handle.net/10393/51455This is the Accepted Manuscript of an article published in the Review of Radical Political Economy that you can find here: https://doi.org/10.1177/04866134221093747This article reviews three models of Democratic Economic Planning, those of Pat Devine and Fikret Adaman, Michael Albert and Robin Hahnel, and Paul Cockshott and Allin Cottrell. Part of a larger research project aiming to merge certain features of these models, this article proposes five criteria to evaluate them. Following a proposal made by David Laibman, it adopts the organization and regulation criteria and add three others to them: limitation, formalization, and scope. Finally, the article offers a brief analysis of the models from those criteria.enAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Democratic economic planningPat Devine and Fikret AdamanMichael Albert and Robin HahnelPaul Cockshott and Allin CottrellNegotiated coordinationParticipatory economicsPostcapitalists modelsArticle10.1177/04866134221093747