Darveau, Peter2023-09-252023-09-252023http://hdl.handle.net/10393/45456https://doi.org/10.20381/ruor-29662The Dual Nature of Decision Trees Decision trees demonstrate a fascinating duality between human intuition and mathematical optimization. Psychologists like Kahneman and Tversky revealed how people rely on mental shortcuts and biased, heuristic-based thinking. This mirrors how decision trees use simple, hierarchical branching based on key features - just like our minds categorize objects using decisive traits. Yet decision trees are also rigorously constructed by calculating metrics like information gain that maximize analytical power. This parallels the structured analysis of rational thinking, optimizing the tree mathematically. Supported by various works by D. Kahneman, Busemeyer et al., and researchers at the university of Ottawa, this duality gives decision trees their interpretability and versatility. The visual tree structure appeals to intuitive pattern recognition, while optimized construction exploits powerful analytical techniques. Understanding this fusion between intuitive shortcuts and calculated reasoning is key to advancing decision tree capabilities and addressing their ethical and regulated use in AI applications.enAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ethicspsychologymachine learningAIdecision treesAI in researchWorking Paper10.20381/7t0s-wg64