<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-23T08:29:48Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:ruor.uottawa.ca:10393/9800" metadataPrefix="oai_dc">https://ruor.uottawa.ca/server/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:ruor.uottawa.ca:10393/9800</identifier><datestamp>2024-02-23T09:05:59Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_10393_242</setSpec><setSpec>col_10393_244</setSpec></header><metadata><oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
   <dc:title>Women&amp;apos;s decisions and decisional conflict regarding long term hormone replacement therapy.</dc:title>
   <dc:creator>Wood, Elizabeth.</dc:creator>
   <dc:contributor>O&amp;apos;Connor, Annette,</dc:contributor>
   <dc:subject>Health Sciences, Obstetrics and Gynecology.</dc:subject>
   <dc:description>Long term preventive hormone replacement therapy (LTP-HRT) is attracting considerable attention for its potential in reducing the incidence of coronary heart disease and osteoporosis associated fractures in post-menopausal women. The study objectives were: (1) to describe women&amp;apos;s decisions and decisional conflict regarding LTP-HRT after being presented with the evidence of benefits and risks and clarifying values; (2) to describe the difference between those who accept or decline LTP-HRT in terms of: (a) expectations of LTP-HRT benefits and risks, and (b) the importance women attach to the benefits and the risks; and (3) to describe the factors women identify as contributing to their decision to take or not take LTP-HRT or being unsure about taking LTP-HRT. The typical woman who participated in the study was 57 years of age; had some post secondary education; and was currently using HRT. Over half the women had at least one CHD risk factor and had a hysterectomy. Less than 15% of the respondents reported having osteoporosis or a first degree relative with breast cancer. Women&amp;apos;s decisions to take LTP-HRT were distributed as follows: 56% yes; 26% no; and 18% unsure. Women who accepted or declined LTP-HRT did not have statistically significant differences in expectations of risk of CHD, osteoporosis, and breast cancer with and without hormone therapy. In contrast, women&amp;apos;s importance ratings of LTP-HRT benefits and side effects did differ significantly between those accepting and declining LTP-HRT. The reasons most often identified by women who chose LTP-HRT were prevention of CHD and osteoporosis (61%) and relief of hot flashes (54%). Those who chose not to take LTP-HRT gave reasons such as dislike of taking pills (47%), and risk of cancer (11%). (Abstract shortened by UMI.)</dc:description>
   <dc:date>2009-03-25T19:56:22Z</dc:date>
   <dc:date>2009-03-25T19:56:22Z</dc:date>
   <dc:date>1995</dc:date>
   <dc:date>1995</dc:date>
   <dc:type>Thesis</dc:type>
   <dc:identifier>Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 34-04, page: 1556.</dc:identifier>
   <dc:identifier>9780612049536</dc:identifier>
   <dc:identifier>http://hdl.handle.net/10393/9800</dc:identifier>
   <dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.20381/ruor-16510</dc:identifier>
   <dc:format>135 p.</dc:format>
   <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
   <dc:publisher>University of Ottawa (Canada)</dc:publisher>
</oai_dc:dc></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>