Development and usability testing of tools to facilitate incorporating intersectionality in knowledge translation

Description
Title: Development and usability testing of tools to facilitate incorporating intersectionality in knowledge translation
Authors: Sibley, Kathryn M.
Kasperavicius, Danielle
Rodrigues, Isabel B.
Giangregorio, Lora
Gibbs, Jenna C.
Graham, Ian D.
Hoens, Alison M.
Kelly, Christine
Lalonde, Dianne
Moore, Julia E.
Ponzano, Matteo
Presseau, Justin
Straus, Sharon E.
Date: 2022-06-27
Abstract: Abstract Background The field of knowledge translation (KT) has been criticized for neglecting contextual and social considerations that influence health equity. Intersectionality, a concept introduced by Black feminist scholars, emphasizes how human experience is shaped by combinations of social factors (e.g., ethnicity, gender) embedded in systemic power structures. Its use has the potential to advance equity considerations in KT. Our objective was to develop and conduct usability testing of tools to support integrating intersectionality in KT through three key phases of KT: identifying the gap; assessing barriers to knowledge use; and selecting, tailoring, and implementing interventions. Methods We used an integrated KT approach and assembled an interdisciplinary development committee who drafted tools. We used a mixed methods approach for usability testing with KT intervention developers that included semi-structured interviews and the System Usability Scale (SUS). We calculated an average SUS score for each tool. We coded interview data using the framework method focusing on actionable feedback. The development committee used the feedback to revise tools, which were formatted by a graphic designer. Results Nine people working in Canada joined the development committee. They drafted an intersectionality primer and one tool that included recommendations, activities, reflection prompts, and resources for each of the three implementation phases. Thirty-one KT intervention developers from three countries participated in usability testing. They suggested the tools to be shorter, contain more visualizations, and use less jargon. Average SUS scores of the draft tools ranged between 60 and 78/100. The development committee revised and shortened all tools, and added two, one-page summary documents. The final toolkit included six documents. Conclusions We developed and evaluated tools to help embed intersectionality considerations in KT. These tools go beyond recommending the use of intersectionality to providing practical guidance on how to do this. Future work should develop guidance for enhancing social justice in intersectionality-enhanced KT.
URL: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08181-1
http://hdl.handle.net/10393/43739
CollectionPublications par les auteurs d'uOttawa publiƩs par BioMed Central // uOttawa authored publications from BioMed Central
Files