Rhetoric and embodiment in Machiavelli's "Discorsi" II/II.

FieldValue
dc.contributor.advisorLetocha, D.,
dc.contributor.authorRichards, Matthew.
dc.date.accessioned2009-03-19T14:07:53Z
dc.date.available2009-03-19T14:07:53Z
dc.date.created1997
dc.date.issued1997
dc.identifier.citationSource: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 36-04, page: 0922.
dc.identifier.isbn9780612263598
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10393/4056
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.20381/ruor-10078
dc.description.abstractThis thesis offers an alternative way to read Machiavelli's Discorsi. As such, it is not a dialectical work; it does not concern itself with undermining or refuting a given position. Rather it introduces a new model with which to understand Machiavelli's writing and thought. A popular view of Machiavelli is that which claims this author to be the founder of modernity. Scholars such as Robert Hariman, in his excellent "Composing Modernity in Machiavelli's Prince." (1989), claim that he inaugurates the period of modern thinking by inventing ontological-thetic rationality and in particular, instrumental reason. It is the central claim of this thesis that it is more productive to consider Machiavelli to be a Renaissance Humanist, making use of this period's rhetorical employ of reason. This thesis embraces a methodology, presented in the introduction as well as in the case-study of Hariman's article, that is decidedly rhetorical. It examines the space of discourse. (Abstract shortened by UMI.)
dc.format.extent128 p.
dc.publisherUniversity of Ottawa (Canada)
dc.subject.classificationPhilosophy.
dc.titleRhetoric and embodiment in Machiavelli's "Discorsi" II/II.
dc.typeThesis
dc.degree.nameM.A.
dc.degree.levelMasters
CollectionTh├Ęses, 1910 - 2010 // Theses, 1910 - 2010

Files
MQ26359.PDF7.04 MBAdobe PDFOpen