Reporting transparency: making the ethical mandate explicit

Title: Reporting transparency: making the ethical mandate explicit
Authors: Nicholls, Stuart G
Langan, Sinéad M
Benchimol, Eric I
Moher, David
Date: 2016-03-16
Abstract: Abstract Improving the transparency and quality of reporting in biomedical research is considered ethically important; yet, this is often based on practical reasons such as the facilitation of peer review. Surprisingly, there has been little explicit discussion regarding the ethical obligations that underpin reporting guidelines. In this commentary, we suggest a number of ethical drivers for the improved reporting of research. These ethical drivers relate to researcher integrity as well as to the benefits derived from improved reporting such as the fair use of resources, minimizing risk of harms, and maximizing benefits. Despite their undoubted benefit to reporting completeness, questions remain regarding the extent to which reporting guidelines can influence processes beyond publication, including researcher integrity or the uptake of scientific research findings into policy or practice. Thus, we consider investigation on the effects of reporting guidelines an important step in providing evidence of their benefits.
CollectionLibre accès - Publications // Open Access - Publications