Comparative effectiveness research: Challenges for medical journals

FieldValue
dc.contributor.authorSox, Harold C
dc.contributor.authorHelfand, Mark
dc.contributor.authorGrimshaw, Jeremy
dc.contributor.authorDickersin, Kay
dc.contributor.authorTovey, David
dc.contributor.authorKnottnerus, J A
dc.contributor.authorTugwell, Peter
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-18T10:56:39Z
dc.date.available2015-12-18T10:56:39Z
dc.date.issued2010-04-28
dc.identifier.citationTrials. 2010 Apr 28;11(1):45
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-11-45
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10393/33818
dc.description.abstractAbstract Editors from a number of medical journals lay out principles for journals considering publication of Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER). In order to encourage dissemination of this editorial, this article is freely available in PLoS Medicine and will be also published in Medical Decision Making, Croatian Medical Journal, The Cochrane Library, Trials, The American Journal of Managed Care, and Journal of Clinical Epidemiology.
dc.titleComparative effectiveness research: Challenges for medical journals
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.date.updated2015-12-18T10:56:39Z
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderSox et al.
CollectionLibre accès - Publications // Open Access - Publications

Files