Exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) and risk of lung cancer in Montreal: a case–control study

FieldValue
dc.contributor.authorAl-Zoughool, Mustafa
dc.contributor.authorPintos, Javier
dc.contributor.authorRichardson, Lesley
dc.contributor.authorParent, Marie-Élise
dc.contributor.authorGhadirian, Parviz
dc.contributor.authorKrewski, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorSiemiatycki, Jack
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-18T10:56:34Z
dc.date.available2015-12-18T10:56:34Z
dc.date.issued2013-12-18
dc.identifier.citationEnvironmental Health. 2013 Dec 18;12(1):112
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-069X-12-112
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10393/33811
dc.description.abstractAbstract Background The objective of the present study was to examine the association between environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) and risk of lung cancer among never smokers, defined as subjects who smoked less than 100 cigarettes in their lifetime. Methods We conducted a population-based case–control study on lung cancer in Montreal, Canada (1996–2000) including 1,203 cases and 1513 controls. The present analysis is restricted to the 44 cases and 436 population controls who reported never smoking and completed the questionnaire on lifetime ETS exposure. Collected information included duration and intensity of exposure from multiple sources: inside home (parents, spouses, roommates and any other co-resident) and outside homes (in vehicles, social settings, and workplace). Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated between ETS and lung cancer, adjusting for age, sex, socioeconomic status (SES), and proxy respondent. Results Overall there was no association between ETS cumulative exposure from all sources (measured in pack-years) and lung cancer: OR = 0.98 (95%CI: 0.40-2.38), comparing upper with lower tertiles of exposure. While there were no elevated ORs associated with ever having lived with parents who smoked (OR = 0.62; 95%CI: 0.32-1.21) or with spouses who smoked (OR = 0.39; 95%CI: 0.18-0.85), ETS exposure from sources outside homes was associated with a slight, although non-significant increased risk: OR = 2.30 (95%CI: 0.85-6.19) for the upper 50% exposed. There were no clear differences in ORs by age at exposure to ETS or by histologic type of tumour, though numbers of subjects in subgroup analyses were too small to provide reliable estimates. Conclusion No clear association between lifetime ETS exposure from all sources and increased risk of lung cancer was found in the current study.
dc.titleExposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) and risk of lung cancer in Montreal: a case–control study
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.date.updated2015-12-18T10:56:34Z
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderAlZoughool et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
CollectionLibre accès - Publications // Open Access - Publications

Files