A tutorial on sensitivity analyses in clinical trials: the what, why, when and how

Title: A tutorial on sensitivity analyses in clinical trials: the what, why, when and how
Authors: Thabane, Lehana
Mbuagbaw, Lawrence
Zhang, Shiyuan
Samaan, Zainab
Marcucci, Maura
Ye, Chenglin
Thabane, Marroon
Giangregorio, Lora
Dennis, Brittany
Kosa, Daisy
Debono, Victoria B
Dillenburg, Rejane
Fruci, Vincent
Bawor, Monica
Lee, Juneyoung
Wells, George
Goldsmith, Charles H
Date: 2013-07-16
Abstract: Abstract Background Sensitivity analyses play a crucial role in assessing the robustness of the findings or conclusions based on primary analyses of data in clinical trials. They are a critical way to assess the impact, effect or influence of key assumptions or variations—such as different methods of analysis, definitions of outcomes, protocol deviations, missing data, and outliers—on the overall conclusions of a study. The current paper is the second in a series of tutorial-type manuscripts intended to discuss and clarify aspects related to key methodological issues in the design and analysis of clinical trials. Discussion In this paper we will provide a detailed exploration of the key aspects of sensitivity analyses including: 1) what sensitivity analyses are, why they are needed, and how often they are used in practice; 2) the different types of sensitivity analyses that one can do, with examples from the literature; 3) some frequently asked questions about sensitivity analyses; and 4) some suggestions on how to report the results of sensitivity analyses in clinical trials. Summary When reporting on a clinical trial, we recommend including planned or posthoc sensitivity analyses, the corresponding rationale and results along with the discussion of the consequences of these analyses on the overall findings of the study.
URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-13-92
CollectionLibre accès - Publications // Open Access - Publications