Development and evaluation of a Driving Observation Schedule (DOS) to study everyday driving performance of older drivers

Description
Title: Development and evaluation of a Driving Observation Schedule (DOS) to study everyday driving performance of older drivers
Authors: Vlahodimitrakou, Z
Charlton, Judith
Langford, Jim
Koppel, Sjaan
DiStefano, Marilyn
Macdonald, Wendy
Mazer, Barbara
Gélinas, Isabelle
Vrkljan, Brenda
Porter, Michelle M
Smith, Glenys
Cull, Andrew
Marshall, Shawn C
Date: 2013
Abstract: This paper describes the development and evaluation of an on-road procedure, the Driving Observation Schedule (DOS), for monitoring individual driving behavior. DOS was developed for use in the Candrive/Ozcandrive five-year prospective study of older drivers. Key features included observations in drivers’ own vehicles, in familiar environments chosen by the driver, with start/end points at their own homes. Participants were 33 drivers aged 75+ years, who drove their selected route with observations recorded during intersection negotiation, lane-changing, merging, low speed maneuvers and maneuver-free driving. Driving behaviors were scored by a specialist occupational therapy driving assessor and another trained observer. Drivers also completed a post-drive survey about the acceptability of DOS. Vehicle position, speed, distance and specific roadways travelled were recorded by an in-vehicle device installed in the participant’s vehicle; this device was also used to monitor participants’ driving over several months, allowing comparison of DOS trips with their everyday driving. Inter-rater reliability and DOS feasibility, acceptability and ecological validity are reported here. On average, drivers completed the DOS trip in 30.48 min (SD=7.99). Inter-rater reliability measures indicated strong agreement between the trained and the expert observers: Intra-class correlations (ICC) = 0.905, CI 95% 0.747-0.965, p < 0.0001; Pearson product correlation, r (18) = .83, p < 0.05. Standard error of the measurement (SEM), method error (ME) and coefficient of variation (CV) measures were consistently small (3.0, 2.9 & 3.3%, respectively). Most participants reported being ‘completely at ease’ (82%) with the driving task and ‘highly familiar with the route’ (97%). Vehicle data showed that DOS trips were similar to participants’ everyday driving trips in roads used, roadway speed limits, drivers’ average speed and speed limit compliance. In summary, preliminary findings suggest that DOS can be scored reliably, is of feasible duration, is acceptable to drivers and representative of everyday driving. Pending further research with a larger sample and other observers, DOS holds promise as a means of quantifying and monitoring changes in older drivers’ performance in environments typical of their everyday driving.
URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10393/32261
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001457513001255
DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.03.027
CollectionMédecine // Medicine
Files