Do obese children perceive submaximal and maximal exertion differently?

Title: Do obese children perceive submaximal and maximal exertion differently?
Authors: Belanger, Kevin
Breithaupt, Peter
Ferraro, Zachary M
Barrowman, Nick
Rutherford, Jane
Hadjiyannakis, Stasia
Colley, Rachel C
Adamo, Kristi B
Date: 2013-06
Abstract: We examined how obese children perceive a maximal cardiorespiratory fitness test compared with a submaximal cardiorespiratory fitness test. Twenty-one obese children (body mass index ≥95th percentile, ages 10-17 years) completed maximal and submaximal cardiorespiratory fitness tests on 2 separate occasions. Oxygen consumption (VO2) and overall perceived exertion (Borg 15-category scale) were measured in both fitness tests. At comparable workloads, perceived exertion was rated significantly higher (P < 0.001) in the submaximal cardiorespiratory fitness test compared with the maximal cardiorespiratory fitness test. The submaximal cardiorespiratory fitness test was significantly longer than the maximal test (14:21 ± 04:04 seconds vs. 12:48 ± 03:27 seconds, P < 0.001). Our data indicate that at the same relative intensity, obese children report comparable or even higher perceived exertion during submaximal fitness testing than during maximal fitness testing. Perceived exertion in a sample of children and youth with obesity may be influenced by test duration and protocol design.
DOI: 10.4137/CMPed.S12524
CollectionPublications en libre accès financées par uOttawa // uOttawa financed open access publications
Belanger.pdf507.43 kBAdobe PDFOpen