A liberal theory of borders.

FieldValue
dc.contributor.advisorKymlicka, Will,
dc.contributor.authorBennett, Fred.
dc.date.accessioned2009-03-25T20:15:15Z
dc.date.available2009-03-25T20:15:15Z
dc.date.created1996
dc.date.issued1996
dc.identifier.citationSource: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 35-05, page: 1165.
dc.identifier.isbn9780612164024
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10393/10429
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.20381/ruor-8286
dc.description.abstractThe thesis investigates normative justifications for any particular division of the world into political units; it investigates the moral considerations which arise when changes to political frontiers are proposed. It is argued that the right of individuals to associate with whom they please is the moral factor which determines the moral legitimacy of political boundaries. Groups of individuals occupying a contiguous territory have a moral right to secede from any existing political unit for any or no reason other than the fact that the majority wishes it, unless it can be demonstrated that such an action would violate someone's rights. Such factors as culture, language, historical accident, etc., are morally irrelevant; they may account for psychological motivations but carry no moral weight. The argument would countenance the secession of Quebec from Canada, the partition of Quebec, or the expulsion of Quebec from the federation by other Canadians.
dc.format.extent137 p.
dc.publisherUniversity of Ottawa (Canada)
dc.subject.classificationPhilosophy.
dc.titleA liberal theory of borders.
dc.typeThesis
dc.degree.nameM.A.
dc.degree.levelMasters
CollectionTh├Ęses, 1910 - 2010 // Theses, 1910 - 2010

Files
MM16402.PDF3.4 MBAdobe PDFOpen